Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300250›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2024

Unravelling collaborative governance dynamics within healthcare networks: a scoping review.

Zakaria Belrhiti, Maryam Bigdeli, Aniss Lakhal, Dib Kaoutar, Saad Zbiri, Sanaa Belabbes

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zakaria BelrhitiInternational School Mohammed VI of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), UM6SS - Anfa City : Bld Mohammed Taïeb Naciri, Commune Hay Hassani 82 403, Casablanca 20230, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-0115-682X
Maryam BigdeliWorld Health Organization, 3 Av. S.A.R. Sidi Mohamed, Rabat, Geneva 10170, Morocco.
Aniss LakhalKnowledge for Health Policies, UM6SS, Anfa City : Bld Mohammed Taïeb Naciri, Commune Hay Hassani 82 403, Casablanca 20230, Morocco.
Dib KaoutarKnowledge for Health Policies, UM6SS, Anfa City : Bld Mohammed Taïeb Naciri, Commune Hay Hassani 82 403, Casablanca 20230, Morocco.
Saad ZbiriInternational School Mohammed VI of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), UM6SS - Anfa City : Bld Mohammed Taïeb Naciri, Commune Hay Hassani 82 403, Casablanca 20230, Morocco.
Sanaa BelabbesInternational School Mohammed VI of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health (UM6SS), UM6SS - Anfa City : Bld Mohammed Taïeb Naciri, Commune Hay Hassani 82 403, Casablanca 20230, Morocco.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many countries, healthcare systems suffer from fragmentation between hospitals and primary care. In response, many governments institutionalized healthcare networks (HN) to facilitate integration and efficient healthcare delivery. Despite potential benefits, the implementation of HN is often challenged by inefficient collaborative dynamics that result in delayed decision-making, lack of strategic alignment and lack of reciprocal trust between network members. Yet, limited attention has been paid to the collective dynamics, challenges and enablers for effective inter-organizational collaborations. To consider these issues, we carried out a scoping review to identify the underlying processes for effective inter-organizational collaboration and the contextual conditions within which these processes are triggered. Following appropriate methodological guidance for scoping reviews, we searched four databases [PubMed (n = 114), Web of Science (n = 171), Google Scholar (n = 153) and Scopus (n = 52)] and used snowballing (n = 22). A total of 37 papers addressing HN including hospitals were included. We used a framework synthesis informed by the collaborative governance framework to guide data extraction and analysis, while being sensitive to emergent themes. Our review showed the prominence of balancing between top-down and bottom-up decision-making (e.g. strategic vs steering committees), formal procedural arrangements and strategic governing bodies in stimulating participative decision-making, collaboration and sense of ownership. In a highly institutionalized context, the inter-organizational partnership is facilitated by pre-existing legal frameworks. HN are suitable for tackling wicked healthcare issues by mutualizing resources, staff pooling and improved coordination. Overall performance depends on the capacity of partners for joint action, principled engagement and a closeness culture, trust relationships, shared commitment, distributed leadership, power sharing and interoperability of information systems To promote the effectiveness of HN, more bottom-up participative decision-making, formalization of governance arrangement and building trust relationships are needed. Yet, there is still inconsistent evidence on the effectiveness of HN in improving health outcomes and quality of care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHospitalsGovernmentHumansSalaries and Fringe Benefitscollaborative governanceframeworkHealthcare networkshospital groupsinter-organizational collaborationscoping review

Identifiers

PMID38300250
PMCPMC11005841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.