Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38299854›Full record

ArticlemBio2024

From wolves to humans: oral microbiome resistance to transfer across mammalian hosts.

Nicholas A Podar, Alyssa A Carrell, Kira A Cassidy, Dawn M Klingeman, Zamin Yang, Erin A Stahler, Douglas W Smith, Daniel R Stahler, Mircea Podar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Genome Analysis of CanineAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas A PodarSchool of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Alyssa A CarrellBiosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1142-4709
Kira A CassidyYellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA.
Dawn M KlingemanBiosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Zamin YangBiosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
Erin A StahlerYellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA.
Douglas W SmithYellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA.
Daniel R StahlerYellowstone Center for Resources, National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA.
Mircea PodarBiosciences Department, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2776-0205

Funding

Culturing of the uncultured: reverse genomics and multispecies consortia in oralR01DE024463 · NIDCR · UT-BATTELLE, LLC-OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LAB · PI JOULINE, IGOR B., LEYS, EUGENE J · 2014 to 2018
$8.2M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian mouth is colonized by complex microbial communities, adapted to specific niches, and in homeostasis with the host. Individual microbes interact metabolically and rely primarily on nutrients provided by the host, with which they have potentially co-evolved along the mammalian lineages. The oral environment is similar across mammals, but the diversity, specificity, and evolution of community structure in related or interacting mammals are little understood. Here, we compared the oral microbiomes of dogs with those of wild wolves and humans. In dogs, we found an increased microbial diversity relative to wolves, possibly related to the transition to omnivorous nutrition following domestication. This includes a larger diversity of Patescibacteria than previously reported in any other oral microbiota. The oral microbes are most distinct at bacterial species or strain levels, with few if any shared between humans and canids, while the close evolutionary relationship between wolves and dogs is reflected by numerous shared taxa. More taxa are shared at higher taxonomic levels including with humans, supporting their more ancestral common mammalian colonization followed by diversification. Phylogenies of selected oral bacterial lineages do not support stable human-dog microbial transfers but suggest diversification along mammalian lineages (apes and canids). Therefore, despite millennia of cohabitation and close interaction, the host and its native community controls and limits the assimilation of new microbes, even if closely related. Higher resolution metagenomic and microbial physiological studies, covering a larger mammalian diversity, should help understand how oral communities assemble, adapt, and interact with their hosts.IMPORTANCENumerous types of microbes colonize the mouth after birth and play important roles in maintaining oral health. When the microbiota-host homeostasis is perturbed, proliferation of some bacteria leads to diseases such as caries and periodontitis. Unlike the gut microbiome, the diversity of oral microbes across the mammalian evolutionary space is not understood. Our study compared the oral microbiomes of wild wolves, dogs, and apes (humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos), with the aim of identifying if microbes have been potentially exchanged between humans and dogs as a result of domestication and cohabitation. We found little if any evidence for such exchanges. The significance of our research is in finding that the oral microbiota and/or the host limit the acquisition of exogenous microbes, which is important in the context of natural exclusion of potential novel pathogens. We provide a framework for expanded higher-resolution studies across domestic and wild animals to understand resistance/resilience.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHominidaeMicrobiotaWolvesAnimalsBacteriaDogsHumansMammalshost adaptationhost-pathogen interactionsmicrobiome evolutionnonhuman microbiotaoral microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38299854
PMCPMC10936156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.