Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38299120›Full record

ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2024

Advances with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Bone Healing.

Blake M Bacevich, Richard David James Smith, Alec M Reihl, Augustus D Mazzocca, Ian D Hutchinson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Blake M BacevichDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Richard David James SmithDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Alec M ReihlDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Augustus D MazzoccaDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Ian D HutchinsonDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advances in the understanding and delivery of osteosynthesis, fracture non-union remains a challenging clinical problem in orthopaedic surgery. To bridge the gap, basic science characterization of fracture healing provides a platform to identify and target biological strategies to enhance fracture healing. Of immense interest, Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a point of care orthobiologic that has been extensively studied in bone and soft tissue healing given its relative ease of translation from the benchtop to the clinic. The aim of this narrative review is to describe and relate pre-clinical in-vitro and in-vivo findings to clinical observations investigating the efficacy of PRP to enhance bone healing for primary fracture management and non-union treatment. A particular emphasis is placed on the heterogeneity of PRP preparation techniques, composition, activation strategies, and delivery. In the context of existing data, the routine use of PRP to enhance primary fracture healing and non-union management cannot be supported. However, it is acknowledged that extensive heterogeneity of PRP treatments in clinical studies adds obscurity; ultimately, refinement (and consensus) of PRP treatments for specific clinical indications, including repetition studies are warranted.

Indexed as

bone regenerationfracture healingfracturesplatelet rich plasmaununited

Identifiers

PMID38299120
PMCPMC10827634
OpenAlexW4391224954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.