Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38299119›Full record

ReviewNational science review2023

Harnessing generative AI to decode enzyme catalysis and evolution for enhanced engineering.

Wen Jun Xie, Arieh Warshel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in National science review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Chemical neighborhood exploration for substrate discovery in biocatalysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A survey on multimodal large language models.National science review · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wen Jun XieDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Center for Natural Products, Drug Discovery and Development, Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-9305
Arieh WarshelDepartment of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7971-5401

Funding

Multiscale Simulations of Biological Systems and ProcessesR35GM122472 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ARIEH WARSHEL · 2017 to 2026
$5.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymes, as paramount protein catalysts, occupy a central role in fostering remarkable progress across numerous fields. However, the intricacy of sequence-function relationships continues to obscure our grasp of enzyme behaviors and curtails our capabilities in rational enzyme engineering. Generative artificial intelligence (AI), known for its proficiency in handling intricate data distributions, holds the potential to offer novel perspectives in enzyme research. Generative models could discern elusive patterns within the vast sequence space and uncover new functional enzyme sequences. This review highlights the recent advancements in employing generative AI for enzyme sequence analysis. We delve into the impact of generative AI in predicting mutation effects on enzyme fitness, catalytic activity and stability, rationalizing the laboratory evolution of

Indexed as

enzyme engineeringenzyme evolutionevolution–catalysis relationshipgenerative AImutation effects

Identifiers

PMID38299119
PMCPMC10829072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.