ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Bilateral Paracentral Corneal Melting and Left-Eye Perforation under Tobemstomig Novel Treatment.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Error in Materials · Investigation by Company/Institution · Lack of Approval from Third Party · Removed ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We present a rare occurrence of bilateral corneal melting and a left-eye corneal perforation in an oncologic patient undergoing a new biological therapy. Case Presentation: A 63-year-old male with a two-day history of a painful left red eye and bilateral visual impairment was enrolled in a multicenter phase-II study comparing tobemstomig/RO7247669, a PD1-LAG3 bispecific antibody, with nivolumab. Clinical examination revealed a bilateral central corneal thinning, and corneal OCT imaging indicated a significant stromal thinning of 124 μm in the right eye and a central corneal perforation of 286 μm in the left eye. Subsequently, the patient underwent surgical intervention involving an autologous partial scleral patch with a Gundersen conjunctival flap in the left eye, alongside a comprehensive topical and systemic treatment regimen. Due to this immune-related adverse event, the patient was excluded from the clinical trial subsequently later revealing he had been on the bispecific treatment. Conclusion: While immune checkpoint inhibitors hold promise in oncology, they can lead to ocular surface issues, including dry-eye keratitis and, in severe cases, anterior segment thinning culminating in corneal perforation. Timely withdrawal of immunotherapy, coupled with multi-level treatment involving anti-inflammatory and corneal healing approaches, is crucial. In cases of corneal perforation, surgical intervention such as cyanoacrylate application or tectonic surgery becomes imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.