ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Intra- and interobserver reliability of two classification systems for posterolateral tibial plateau fractures in the setting of an ACL rupture.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Incidence of Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fractures in the Setting of Knee Dislocations.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures occur frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Some authors advocate operative treatment of high-grade impaction fractures, which has led to the development of classification systems. Our study aims (1) to describe and compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of the two most used classifications and (2) to assess correlations between the grade of bony posterolateral tibial injury, patient characteristics and short-to mid-term revision rate after ACL reconstruction. Materials and methods: In a retrospective series of 163 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction, two reviewers independently evaluated the preoperative MRI scans. Conform the Menzdorf and Bernholt classification the presence and grade of an associated posterolateral impaction fracture were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed to test for both study hypotheses. Results: 171 primary ACL cases were evaluated. Mean follow-up time was 41 months (range 12-154, SD = 17.1). Mean age was 32 years (range 13-59, SD = 12). Posterolateral impaction fractures were present in 111 (64.9 %) and 120 (70.0 %) cases, according to the Menzdorf and Bernholt classification. A Segond fracture was present in 19 (11.1 %) cases. Kappa value was 0.47 for intra- and 0.52 for the interobserver reliability for the Menzdorf classification (moderate reliability). For the Bernholt classification kappa values were 0.66 and 0.61, respectively (good reliability). A Segond fracture correlated significantly with the presence of a posterolateral impaction fracture (p < 0.05). A significant association was present between patients necessitating ACL revision surgery and patients for whom operative intervention for the posterolateral impression was advised following the Menzdorf classification (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Inter- and intraobserver reliability testing for classifying posterolateral tibial fractures resulted in moderate to good reliability. High-grade posterolateral tibial fractures should be identified, selective treatment should be considered as they are associated with higher revision rates after ACL reconstruction if left untreated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.