ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Value of chemical shift imaging in the evaluation of neural foramen stenosis.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Evaluation of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Radiologic Grading Systems: A Systematic Review.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemical shift Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is often routinely acquired to assess a spectrum of spinal lesions due to its ability versatility to obtain rapid sequences at the expense of spatial resolution images. It is one of the quickest sequences to acquire at the expense of spatial resolution. Objective: In this study we assess the diagnostic efficacy of Chemical shift Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of Neural Foraminal stenosis. Materials and methods: Conventional T2, T1 and STIR sagittal and axial images as well as 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences of 25 consecutive patients presenting with back pain and radiculopathy were reviewed. The degree of neural stenosis in the lumbar spine foramina on both sides was graded using the Lee classification on T2 and 'in' and 'out' phase MRI sequences by two independent MSK radiologists. Statistical analysis was performed using paired T-Test and Cohen's weighted kappa test was applied as a measure of agreement between the two observed raters. Results: A total of 250 lumbar neural foramina were assessed. There was substantial agreement (Cohen's weighted kappa) for both raters between 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences (rater 1 = 0.699, rater 2 = 0.718), as well as good agreement between raters for both 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences (in phase = 0.656, 'out' phase = 0.576). However, when compared to the gold standard rating on a T2 based sequence, ratings on in' and 'out' phase MRI sequences overestimated the degree of stenosis. When comparing 'in' and 'out' ratings to the T2 ratings, agreement was poor with kappa ranging from 0.132 to 0.202. Conclusion: Though both 'in' and 'out' phase chemical shift sagittal MRI sequences can be used to analyse neural foraminal stenosis, given its propensity to over-estimate the degree of stenosis in comparison to the T2 based images, assessment of the condition on these complementary limited sequences technique should be avoided/should be undertaken with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.