Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298873›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2023

A bird's eye view of the mental health systems in India.

Satish Suhas, Banavaram A Arvind, Gautham M Sukumar, Pradeep S Banandur, Lakshmi P Nirisha, Channaveerachari N Kumar, Vivek Benegal, Girish N Rao, Mathew Varghese, Gopalkrishna Gururaj and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Psychiatry Training and Faculty Development in India.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satish SuhasDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Banavaram A ArvindCentre for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Gautham M SukumarCentre for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pradeep S BanandurCentre for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Lakshmi P NirishaDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Channaveerachari N KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vivek BenegalDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Girish N RaoCentre for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mathew VargheseDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Gopalkrishna GururajCentre for Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
NMHS National Collaborators Group
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A staggering 85% of the global population resides in low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs). India stands as an exemplary pioneer in the realm of mental health initiatives among LAMICs, having launched its National Mental Health Program in 1982. It is imperative to effectively evaluate mental health systems periodically to cultivate a dynamic learning model sustained through continuous feedback from mental healthcare structures and processes. Materials and Methods: The National Mental Health Survey (NMHS) embarked on the Mental Health Systems Assessment (MHSA) in 12 representative Indian states, following a pilot program that contextually adapted the World Health Organization's Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems. The methodology involved data collection from various sources and interviews with key stakeholders, yielding a set of 15 quantitative, 5 morbidity, and 10 qualitative indicators, which were employed to encapsulate the functional status of mental health systems within the surveyed states by using a scorecard framework. Results: The NMHS MHSA for the year 2015-16 unveiled an array of indices, and the resultant scorecard succinctly encapsulated the outcomes of the systems' evaluation across the 12 surveyed states in India. Significantly, the findings revealed considerable interstate disparities, with some states such as Gujarat and Kerala emerging as frontrunners in the evaluation among the surveyed states. Nevertheless, notable gaps were identified in several domains within the assessed mental health systems. Conclusion: MHSA, as conducted within the framework of NMHS, emerges as a dependable, valid, and holistic mechanism for documenting mental health systems in India. However, this process necessitates periodic iterations to serve as critical indicators guiding the national mental health agenda, including policies, programs, and their impact evaluation.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyevaluationIndiamental health systemsmonitoringperformancepsychiatryservicessystems

Identifiers

PMID38298873
PMCPMC10826870
OpenAlexW4389476037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.