Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298803›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2024

Perseveration and Shifting in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as a Function of Uncertainty, Punishment, and Serotonergic Medication.

Annemieke M Apergis-Schoute, Febe E van der Flier, Samantha H Y Ip, Jonathan W Kanen, Matilde M Vaghi, Naomi A Fineberg, Barbara J Sahakian, Rudolf N Cardinal, Trevor W Robbins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Annemieke M Apergis-SchouteSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Febe E van der FlierBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Samantha H Y IpBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jonathan W KanenBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Matilde M VaghiBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Naomi A FinebergHertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, National Health Service, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Barbara J SahakianBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rudolf N CardinalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Trevor W RobbinsBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

Training the Next Generation of Psychiatrists-Scientists for Translational ResearchR25MH129256 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI ANTONIA S NEW, Maria De Las Mercedes Perez Rodriguez · 2023 to 2026
$831k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17213Medical Research Council MR/W014386/1NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH129256Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The nature of cognitive flexibility deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), which historically have been tested with probabilistic reversal learning tasks, remains elusive. Here, a novel deterministic reversal task and inclusion of unmedicated patients in the study sample illuminated the role of fixed versus uncertain rules/contingencies and of serotonergic medication. Additionally, our understanding of probabilistic reversal was enhanced through theoretical computational modeling of cognitive flexibility in OCD. Methods: We recruited 49 patients with OCD, 21 of whom were unmedicated, and 43 healthy control participants matched for age, IQ, and gender. Participants were tested on 2 tasks: a novel visuomotor deterministic reversal learning task with 3 reversals (feedback rewarding/punishing/neutral) measuring accuracy/perseveration and a 2-choice visual probabilistic reversal learning task with uncertain feedback and a single reversal measuring win-stay and lose-shift. Bayesian computational modeling provided measures of learning rate, reinforcement sensitivity, and stimulus stickiness. Results: Unmedicated patients with OCD were impaired on the deterministic reversal task under punishment only at the first and third reversals compared with both control participants and medicated patients with OCD, who had no deficit. Perseverative errors were correlated with OCD severity. On the probabilistic reversal task, unmedicated patients were only impaired at reversal, whereas medicated patients were impaired at both the learning and reversal stages. Computational modeling showed that the overall change was reduced feedback sensitivity in both OCD groups. Conclusions: Both perseveration and increased shifting can be observed in OCD, depending on test conditions including the predictability of reinforcement. Perseveration was related to clinical severity and remediated by serotonergic medication.

Indexed as

OCDPerseverationPunishmentSerotoninShiftingUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID38298803
PMCPMC10829647
OpenAlexW4384023416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.