Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298772›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Active Surveillance Without Annual Rebiopsy in Patients with Grade Group 1 or 2 Prostate Cancer: The Prospective PROMM-AS Study.

Birte Valentin, Christian Arsov, Tim Ullrich, Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Matthias Boschheidgen, Boris A Hadaschik, Francesco Giganti, Markus Giessing, Cristina Lopez-Cotarelo, Irene Esposito and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Birte ValentinDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian ArsovDepartment of Urology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Tim UllrichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Rouvier Al-MonajjedDepartment of Urology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Matthias BoschheidgenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Boris A HadaschikDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Francesco GigantiDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Markus GiessingDepartment of Urology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Cristina Lopez-CotareloInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Irene EspositoInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Gerald AntochDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter AlbersDepartment of Urology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jan Philipp RadtkeDepartment of Urology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lars SchimmöllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEEssen University Hospital · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DERuhr University Bochum · DEStädtische Kliniken Mönchengladbach · DEUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) may allow patients with prostate cancer (PC) on active surveillance (AS) to avoid repeat prostate biopsies during monitoring. Objective: To assess the ability of mpMRI to reduce guideline-mandated biopsy and to predict grade group upgrading in patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) 1 or GG 2 PC using Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scores. The hypothesis was that the AS disqualification rate (ASDQ) rate could be reduced to 15%. Design setting and participants: PROMM-AS was a prospective study assessing 2-yr outcomes for an mpMRI-guided AS protocol. A 12 mo after AS inclusion on the basis of MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy (FBx), all patients underwent mpMRI. For patients with stable mpMRI (PRECISE 1-3), repeat biopsy was deferred and follow-up mpMRI was scheduled for 12 mo later. Patients with mpMRI progression (PRECISE 4-5) underwent FBx. At the end of the study, follow-up FBx was indicated for all patients. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for upgrading to GG 2 in the GG 1 group, and to GG 3 in the GG 2 group on MRI. We performed regression analyses that included clinical variables. Results and limitations: The study included 101 patients with PC (60 GG 1 and 41 GG 2). Histopathological progression occurred in 31 patients, 18 in the GG 1 group and 13 in the GG 2 group. Thus, the aim of reducing the ASDQ rate to 15% was not achieved. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for PRECISE scoring of MRI were 94%, 64%, 81%, and 88% in the GG 1 group, and 92%, 50%, 92%, and 50%, respectively, in the GG 2 group. On regression analysis, initial prostate-specific antigen ( Conclusions: MRI-guided monitoring of patients on AS using PRECISE scores avoided unnecessary follow-up biopsies in 88% of patients with GG 1 PC and predicted upgrading during 2-yr follow-up in both GG 1 and GG 2 PC. Patient summary: We investigated whether MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scores can be used to guide whether patients with lower-risk prostate cancer who are on active surveillance (AS) need to undergo repeat biopsies. Follow-up biopsy was deferred for 1 year for patients with a stable score and performed for patients whose score progressed. After 24 months on AS, all men underwent MRI and biopsy. Among patients with grade group 1 cancer and a stable MRI score, 88% avoided biopsy. For patients with MRI score progression, AS termination was correctly recommended in 81% of grade group 1 and 92% of grade group 2 cases.

Indexed as

Active surveillanceMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerProstate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE)Transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38298772
PMCPMC10829616
OpenAlexW4389980307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.