Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298765›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2024

The Probability of Metastases Within Different Prostate-specific Antigen Ranges Using Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.

Wietske I Luining, Marinus J Hagens, Dennie Meijer, Joanneke B Ringia, Tessa de Weijer, Huseyyin O Bektas, Rosemarijn H Ettema, Remco J J Knol, Ton A Roeleveld, Sandra Srbljin and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wietske I LuiningDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marinus J HagensDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennie MeijerDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joanneke B RingiaDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa de WeijerDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Huseyyin O BektasDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rosemarijn H EttemaDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Remco J J KnolDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Hospital, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Ton A RoeleveldProstate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandra SrbljinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands.
Saskia WeltingsDepartment of Urology, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands.
Jose C C KoppesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reindert J A van MoorselaarDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim J van LeeuwenProstate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniela E Oprea-LagerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
André N VisDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLZaans Medisch Centrum · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: The association between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and probability of metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has not yet been established in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to assess the probability of metastatic disease within different PSA ranges using PSMA PET/CT for initial staging of PCa, and to identify both the anatomical distribution and the predictors of metastases on PSMA PET/CT. Methods: In total, 2193 patients with newly diagnosed PCa were retrospectively studied. PSMA PET/CT was performed for staging purposes between January 2017 and May 2022. The proportion of patients with PSMA-avid metastases, stratified by PSA level, was studied. A vast majority of patients in whom at least one high-risk prognostic factor was present underwent PSMA PET/CT. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of metastases on PSMA PET/CT using clinical, biochemical, radiological, and pathological variables. Key findings and limitations: The median PSA level at PSMA PET/CT was 14.1 ng/ml. Any metastatic disease (miN1-M1a-c) was observed in 34.7% (763/2193) of all patients and distant metastases (miM1a-c) in 25.4% (557/2193) of patients. The presence of any metastatic disease increased with PSA levels, being 15.4% in men with PSA levels <10 ng/ml and 87.5% in men with PSA levels >100 ng/ml. The multivariable logistic regression analysis found significant associations between the presence of any metastatic disease and PSA subgroups, clinical tumor stage ≥T2, grade group >3, and radiological tumor stage ≥T3b. Conclusions and clinical implications: This is the first large epidemiological study in patients with PCa demonstrating the association between PSA subgroups and metastatic disease on modern imaging PSMA PET/CT. Data from this study can be used to counsel patients on the probability of metastatic disease at the time of PSA screening and to provide guidance on existing guidelines. Patient summary: The prostate-specific antigen level could be used to assess the risk of metastases on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron (PSMA) emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). This knowledge is valuable for selecting patients who will benefit most from metastatic screening with PSMA PET/CT.

Indexed as

Metastatic diseaseProstate cancerProstate-specific antigenProstate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID38298765
PMCPMC10829602
OpenAlexW4390122341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.