ArticleHeliyon2024
Determining the appropriate natural fibers for intelligent green wearable devices made from biomaterials via multi-attribute decision making model.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intelligent and green wearable technology becomes essential for new modern societies. This work introduces a multi criteria decision making model to properly assess and compare relative desired criteria for selecting the most suitable constituents for green body wearable bio-products made from bio-based materials. It aims to enhance the sustainability of intelligent green wearable devices by providing support in the selection process of lightweight, eco-friendly materials suitable for personal body wearable bio-products made of natural fiber composites to improve qualities that may help in better monitoring human vital signs and thereby address the health care concern. The relative intrinsic characteristic and merits of various natural fibers were utilized to compare and evaluate their relative performance in bio-composites. The model considered several evaluation factors like mechanical performance including tensile strength and modulus of elasticity, comfortability including size and weight, availability, fiber orientation, cellulose content, and cost. Results have demonstrated different priorities of the considered natural fibers relative to each evaluation factor. However, the model was capable of properly evaluating and ranking the best fibers relative to the whole conflicting evaluation criteria simultaneously. The closeness of priorities in several cases emphasizes upon using such decision making models to be able to judge the relative merits of natural fibers for such applications. It can also help designers to avoid bias during determining the best alternatives considering several conflicting evaluation criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.