ArticleHeliyon2024
Improved chaos grasshopper optimizer and its application to HRES techno-economic evaluation.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Optimizing electric load forecasting with support vector regression/LSTM optimized by flexible Gorilla troops algorithm and neural networks a case study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Optimization of off-grid renewable energy systems using a hybrid version of golden search algorithm.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- The improved aquila optimization approach for cost-effective design of hybrid renewable energy systems.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Modified artificial neural network based on developed snake optimization algorithm for short-term price prediction.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current political and economic trends are moving more and more toward the use of renewable and clean energy as a result of rising energy use and diminishing fossil fuel supplies. In this paper, an improved chaos-based grasshopper optimizer used for techno-economic evaluation in integrated green power systems is investigated. The integrated system consists of a fuel cell system, a wind farm, and solar energy. The integrated solar, wind, and hydrogen fuel cell architectures increase the effectiveness and electrical output of the system while needing less energy storage in structures that are unconnected from the grid. The grasshopper optimization technique and chaos theory have been combined to create the suggested chaotic grasshopper optimizer in this study. The performance, precision, and robustness of this optimization were then assessed, using four benchmark tasks. The ICGO model is utilized to assign suitable ratings to all system devices, thereby guaranteeing the attainment of optimal performance and efficiency. The Net Present Cost (NPC) analysis revealed that the ICGO algorithm attained the lowest minimum NPC value of 274.541E4 USD and the highest maximum NPC value of 311.94E4 USD. The average NPC value of the ICGO algorithm (289.176E4 USD) was found to be comparable to the other algorithms examined in the study. These findings indicate that the ICGO algorithm outperformed other optimization algorithms in minimizing the cost of the renewable energy system. The chaotic grasshopper optimizer can handle several targets, restrictions, and variables with ease, and the results demonstrate that it is substantially more efficient and precise than standard optimization techniques. It is also quite durable, with minimal performance degradation as compared to the benchmark solutions. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of the chaos grasshopper optimizer as an HRES technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.