Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298687›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

The impact of 180° return bend inclination on pressure drop characteristics and phase distribution during oil-water flow.

Mushtaque Momin, Faisal Rahmani, Emad Makki, Mukesh Sharma, Jayant Giri, T Sathish

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mushtaque MominDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, 835215, India.
Faisal RahmaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, 835215, India.
Emad MakkiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia.
Mukesh SharmaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, 835215, India.
Jayant GiriDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, India.
T SathishSaveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work aims to capture the influence of the inclination of the return bend on flow patterns and pressure drop during oil-water flow. The experiments were carried out for different inclinations (0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°) of return bend for various superficial velocity combinations of oil (kerosene) and water ranging from 0.07 to 0.66 m/s. The experiments showed that pressure drop increases with the increase in inclination. However, the pressure drop at a fixed inclination (say 15°) decreases with the increase in the superficial velocity of the water. Distinct flow patterns observed in the return bend were droplet flow, film inversion, slug flow, plug flow and large slug flow. Droplet flow dominates at the lower range of kerosene (i.e.,

Indexed as

Gravitational effectLiquid-liquid two-phase flowPhase distributionPressure dropSuperficial velocity

Identifiers

PMID38298687
PMCPMC10827695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.