Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298629›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Policy options for promoting wider use of biopesticides in Thai agriculture.

Suwanna Praneetvatakul, Pepijn Schreinemachers, Kampanat Vijitsrikamol, Chakrit Potchanasin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suwanna PraneetvatakulDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, 50 Phaholyothin Rd., Bangkok, 10900 Thailand.
Pepijn SchreinemachersWorld Vegetable Center, East and Southeast Asia, Bangkok, 10903 Thailand.
Kampanat VijitsrikamolDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, 50 Phaholyothin Rd., Bangkok, 10900 Thailand.
Chakrit PotchanasinDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University, 50 Phaholyothin Rd., Bangkok, 10900 Thailand.
Kasetsart University · THWorld Vegetable Center · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopesticides are rapidly growing in importance for crop protection globally, but nearly all growth is happening in high income countries. No previous work systematically analyzed how lower-income countries can better benefit from the increased availability of biopesticides, which is important because these countries are particularly affected by the adverse effects of chemical pesticide use. Here we review the legislation of biopesticides in Thailand and combine this with stakeholder interviews and interview data from 300 smallholder farmers producing rice, fruit, vegetables, and flowers. We find that Thailand has adopted a biopesticide registration system that facilitates a fast-track registration, but it is still relatively costly considering the small market size. While 65 % of the sampled farmers used biopesticides, most farmers still heavily relied on conventional pesticides as their main method to control pests. Education, farming experience, positive attitudes of biopesticides, adoption of other integrated pest management methods and contacts with government extension agents were positively associated with biopesticide use. Coordinated action is needed to stimulate the supply of a wider range of biopesticide products while promoting adoption among farmers.

Indexed as

Crop protectionPesticidePolicySustainable agricultureThailand

Identifiers

PMID38298629
PMCPMC10827763
OpenAlexW4390752635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.