ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024
Fear of childbirth prolongs interpregnancy interval: A nationwide register-based quantile logistic regression analysis.
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The lasting effects of fear of childbirth: parous women's experiences of postponing or avoiding subsequent pregnancies.Reproductive health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It is not well studied how fear of childbirth (FOC) influences the interpregnancy interval (IPI). Thus, we aimed to analyze the association between FOC and the length of the IPI. Methods: All women having their first and second pregnancies during the study period (2004-2018) were gathered from the Finnish Medical Birth Register. A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between the FOC and subsequent length of the IPI. The length of the IPI was assessed separately for women with FOC in the first pregnancy, and for women who developed the FOC in the second pregnancy. IPIs with a length in the lower quartal were considered short IPIs, and length in the upper quartal as long IPIs. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% CIs were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 52 709 women with short IPI (<1.05 years), 105 604 women with normal IPI, and 52 889 women with long IPI (>2.57 years) were included. A total of 3606 women had FOC in the first pregnancy, and a total of 11 473 had their first FOC diagnosis in the second pregnancy. Women with FOC in the first pregnancy had lower odds for short IPI (aOR 0.88, CI 0.81-0.95) and higher odds for long IPI (aOR 1.30, CI 1.21-1.40). Women with the first FOC diagnosis in the second pregnancy had higher odds for long IPI (aOR 1.68, CI 1.61-1.75), When only vaginal deliveries in the first pregnancy were included, women with FOC in the second pregnancy had lower odds for long IPI (aOR 0.71, CI 0.66-0.75) and higher odds for long IPI (aOR 1.52, CI 1.41-1.62), when only cesarean section was included. Conclusion: The main finding of this study was that women with FOC had notably higher odds for long IPI. The etiologic and background factors behind FOC should be better recognized and prevented, and FOC should not only be considered as a complicating factor for pregnancy and delivery but also a factor that strongly affects the desire of women to get pregnant again.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.