Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298347›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2023

MICROBACTERIAL PROFILE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AND THEIR PATTERN OF SENSITIVITY IN TERTIARY HOSPITAL IN NORTH CENTRAL HOSPITAL, NIGERIA.

A A Abiodun, A O Adekanye, C N D Nwachukwu, T S Ayanbeku, J A Abiodun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A A AbiodunDepartment of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Bida.
A O AdekanyeDepartment of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Bida.
C N D NwachukwuDepartment of Obstretrics and Gyneacology, Federal Medical Centre, Bida.
T S AyanbekuDepartment of Microbiology, Federal Medical Centre, Bida.
J A AbiodunDepartment of Community Health, Federal Medical Centre, Bida.
Federal Medical Centre · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) remain a problem in surgical practice despite the improvement in advanced technology and the use of antibiotics. Also, there is also a growing menace of antibiotic resistance which poses a great challenge in treating SSI. The study aimed to find out the most common bacterial pathogens responsible for surgical site infection and their antibiotic sensitivity profile. Material and Methods: It was a descriptive study carried out in Federal Medical Centre, Bida. 500 surgical procedures were carried out and samples were obtained from 73 patients that showed clinical evidence of SSI for culture and susceptibility test. Samples were collected from each patient using a swab stick. Bacteriological culture examination and identification were done following standard microbiological techniques. Susceptibility testing was performed by Kirby-Bauer technique according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards institute 26th edition. Data were analysed using SPSS 26. Results: Out of the 73 samples taken, 83 isolates were obtained while five samples yielded no growth. Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were predominant in 73(88.1%) with the dominant being E. Coli species (38.6%). From the strains that were isolated, there were 9(10.8%) Staph aureus was the only Gram-positive organism. Concerning antibiotic susceptibility, the results demonstrated remarkably high multidrug resistance. However, the meropenems and amikacin demonstrated good activities against all gram-negative isolates. The resistance pattern of enterobacteriaceae to tested antibiotics were to ciprofloxacin (90.2%) levofloxacin (82.2%) augmentin (88.5%) ceftriaxone (85.2%) ceftazidime (80.3%), gentamicin (80.3%) meropenems (14.8%) amikacin (16.4%.). Conclusion: The study demonstrated a high alarming rate of multidrug resistance following SSI and this should call for concerns and surveillance among surgeons.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceAntibioticsBacteria

Identifiers

PMID38298347
PMCPMC10811704
OpenAlexW4394755387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.