ArticleCureus2024
Comparing Texture Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient MRI in Hepatocellular Adenoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantitation for Differentiate Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Hepatocellular Adenoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using MRI-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map-driven radiomics to differentiate between hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) features. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study involved 55 patients with liver tumors (20 with HCA and 35 with HCC), featuring 106 lesions equally distributed between hepatic carcinoma and hepatic adenoma who underwent texture analysis on ADC map MR images. The analysis identified several imaging features that significantly differed between the HCA and HCC groups. Four classification models were compared for distinguishing HCA from HCC including linear support vector machine (linear-SVM), radial basis function SVM (RBF-SVM), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN).
resultsThe k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier displayed the top accuracy (0.89) and specificity (0.90). Linear-SVM and KNN classifiers showcased the leading sensitivity (0.88) for both, with the KNN classifier achieving the highest precision (0.9). In comparison, the conventional interpretation had lower sensitivity (70.1%) and specificity (77.9%).
conclusionThe study found that utilizing ADC maps for texture analysis in MR images is a viable method to differentiate HCA from HCC, yielding promising results in identified texture features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.