ArticleCureus2024
Acinic Cell Carcinoma of the Breast: A Case Report and Review of Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of breast acinar cell carcinoma combined with metaplastic carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- New insights into acinic cell carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathology, origin of histology, molecular features, prognosis, and treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) is an exceedingly rare type of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We are reporting a case of a 46-year-old female patient who presented with a palpable lump in her left breast not associated with pain, pruritis, or change of skin color. An open biopsy revealed a mass of about 20 x 25 mm of fleshy, white tan with a lobular configuration and necrosis. The histopathological examination revealed cells with cytoplasmic granularity arranged in a microglandular pattern and a solid pattern, and the case was initially reported as ACC. The most remarkable feature was the presence of small and large, brightly eosinophilic cytoplasmic granules, and some cells are clear or multivacuolated, resembling lipoblasts. Cellular pleomorphism and anaplasia are very mild, and the mitotic activity was very low. The tumor showed a scant and vascularized stroma in the area of hyalinization. Small clusters of lymphoid infiltration in the stroma were seen. Histochemical stains revealed that the acinar cells in ACC contain abundant diastase-resistant, periodic acid Schiff (PAS)-positive cytoplasmic granules. Mucicarmine and Alcian blue were negative. The immunohistochemistry workup revealed that the case was positive for discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumors-1 (DOG-1) and the positivity pattern ranged from apical membranous, cytoplasmic, and complete membranous. In addition, the tumor cells were positive for low-molecular-weight cytokeratin, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). The FISH workup for the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion was negative, arguing against secretory carcinoma (SC). A diagnosis of acinar cell carcinoma of the breast is very rare, and the presence of cytoplasmic granules is helpful for its diagnosis. In the absence of these granules, the diagnosis is very difficult, and other diagnoses will be put in the differential diagnosis, particularly SC, lactating adenosis, and microglandular adenosis. Immunohistochemical and histochemical stains and genetic workups will support the diagnosis of ACC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.