Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298305›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

History and Evolution of the Tuning Fork.

Keerthi Eraniyan, Latha Ganti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A brief history of otologic surgery: restoring hearing through the ages.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keerthi EraniyanBiomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
Latha GantiEmergency Medicine & Neurology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is a summary of the evolution of the tuning fork, a crucial part of the cranial nerves and auditory examination. The tuning fork is a two-pronged fork that resonates at a specific pitch when struck against a surface and has been proven to be incredibly useful in diagnosing and detecting hearing disorders. The tuning fork, an unassuming device in modern medicine, traces its origins back to an era when scientific understanding and medical diagnostics were in their nascent stages. Since its inception, this unpretentious instrument has played a pivotal role in the hands of healthcare practitioners, aiding in the diagnosis and assessment of various medical conditions. This paper embarks on a captivating journey through time to explore the origin, evolution, and significant milestones in the development of the tuning fork. From the first suggestion of differentiating hearing disorders to present-day tuning forks, this paper maps the different stages that the tuning fork has gone through and how its use has changed over time. Along the way, we will discover how the tuning fork has harmonized with music, medicine, and various scientific pursuits, enriching our understanding of sound and resonance while leaving an indelible mark on the course of human history. Delving into the historical context of its creation, this review uncovers the ingenious minds that birthed this innovative device and the pivotal moments that brought it to the forefront of human endeavors.

Indexed as

history of neurologymedical educationmedical instrumentsneurologic examinationtuning fork

Identifiers

PMID38298305
PMCPMC10829824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.