Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38298203›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Comparing movement-related cortical potential between real and simulated movement tasks from an ecological validity perspective.

Kakuya Ogahara, Akira Nakashima, Tomotaka Suzuki, Kenichi Sugawara, Naoshin Yoshida, Arihiro Hatta, Takefumi Moriuchi, Toshio Higashi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kakuya OgaharaDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Health Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Akira NakashimaDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Health Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tomotaka SuzukiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Japan.
Kenichi SugawaraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Kanagawa University of Human Services, Yokosuka, Japan.
Naoshin YoshidaDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Health Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Arihiro HattaDepartment of Physical Recreation, School of Physical Education, Tokai University, Hiratsuka, Japan.
Takefumi MoriuchiDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Health Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Toshio HigashiDepartment of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Health Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Nagasaki University · JPKanagawa University of Human Services · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Concerns regarding the ecological validity of movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) experimental tasks that are related to motor learning have recently been growing. Therefore, we compared MRCP during real movement task (RMT) and simulated movement task (SMT) from an ecological validity perspective. Methods: The participants performed both RMT and SMT, and MRCP were measured using electroencephalogram (EEG). EEG was based on the 10-20 method, with electrodes placed in the motor cortex (C3 and C4) and supplementary motor cortex (FCz [between Fz and Cz] and Cz) areas. This experiment examined the MRCP using Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and negative slope (NS') onset times, and BP, NS', and motor potential (MP) amplitudes during the task. Results: The results revealed that the SMT exhibited later BP and NS' onset times and smaller BP, NS', and MP amplitudes than the RMT. Furthermore, in RMT, the onset time of MRCP was delayed, and the amplitude of MRCP was smaller in the second half of the 200 times task than in the first half, whereas in SMT, there was no change in onset time and amplitude. The SMT showed a different MRCP than the RMT, suggesting that the ecological validity of the task should be fully considered when investigating the cortical activity associated with motor skill learning using MRCP. Conclusion: Ecological validity of the study should be fully considered when investigating the cortical activity associated with motor skill learning using MRCP. Moreover, it is important to understand the differences between the two methods when applied clinically.

Indexed as

actual movement taskecological validityelectroencephalogrammotor learningmovement-related cortical potentialssimulated movement task

Identifiers

PMID38298203
PMCPMC10828031
OpenAlexW4390952936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.