Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297838›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2024

Most Tibetan weedy barleys originated via recombination between Btr1 and Btr2 in domesticated barley.

Guangqi Gao, Luxi Yan, Yu Cai, Yu Guo, Congcong Jiang, Qiang He, Sarah Tasnim, Zongyun Feng, Jun Liu, Jing Zhang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The origins and spread of the opium poppy (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guangqi GaoState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Luxi YanState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Yu CaiState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Yu GuoLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, 06466 Seeland, Germany.
Congcong JiangState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Qiang HeState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Sarah TasnimState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Zongyun FengCollege of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Jun LiuState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Jing ZhangState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Takao KomatsudaCrop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China.
Martin MascherLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, 06466 Seeland, Germany.
Ping YangState Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Grain Crop Genetic Resources Evaluation and Utilization (MARA)/Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China. Electronic address: yangping@caas.cn.
Institute of Crop Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSichuan Agricultural University · CNLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research · DEShandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

Non-US Government Research Support type
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tibetan weedy barleys reside at the edges of qingke (hulless barley) fields in Tibet (Xizang). The spikes of these weedy barleys contain or lack a brittle rachis, with either two- or six-rowed spikes and either hulled or hulless grains at maturity. Although the brittle rachis trait of Tibetan weedy barleys is similar to that of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum Thell.), these plants share genetic similarity with domesticated barley. The origin of Tibetan weedy barleys continues to be debated. Here, we show that most Tibetan weedy barleys originated from cross-pollinated hybridization of domesticated barleys, followed by hybrid self-pollination and recombination between Non-brittle rachis 1 (btr1) and 2 (btr2). We discovered the specific genetic ancestry of these weedy barleys in South Asian accessions. Tibetan weedy barleys exhibit lower genetic diversity than wild and Chinese landraces/cultivars and share a close relationship with qingke, genetically differing from typical eastern and western barley populations. We classified Tibetan weedy barleys into two groups, brittle rachis (BR) and non-brittle rachis (NBR); these traits align with the haplotypes of the btr1 and btr2 genes. Whereas wild barleys carry haplotype combinations of Btr1 and Btr2, each showing lower proportions in a population, the recombinant haplotype BTR2H8+BTR1H24 is predominant in the BR group. Haplotype block analysis based on whole-genome sequencing revealed two recombination breakpoints, which are present in 80.6% and 16.8% of BR accessions according to marker-assisted analysis. Hybridization events between wild and domesticated barley were rarely detected. These findings support the notion that Tibetan weedy barleys originated via recombination between Btr1 and Btr2 in domesticated barley.

Indexed as

HordeumRecombination, GeneticDomesticationGenetic VariationTibetagriocrithonbrittle rachisde-domesticationout-pollinationrecombinationTibetan weedy barley

Identifiers

PMID38297838
PMCPMC11121735
OpenAlexW4391344021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.