ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
Analytical corrections for B
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Xenon-129 magnetic resonance imaging detects ongoing ventilation improvements in people with cystic fibrosis receiving highly effective modulator therapy.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
- Comparing Mean-anchored Generalized Linear Binning with Established Methods to Quantify Xenon-129 Ventilation Defect Percentage.Academic radiology · 2026Article
- Optimizing Xenon 129 Ventilation MRI in Cystic Fibrosis with Spiral Imaging and Flip-Angle Correction.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- A decay-modeled compressed sensing reconstruction approach for non-Cartesian hyperpolarizedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHyperpolarized xenon MRI suffers from heterogeneous coil bias and magnetization decay that obscure pulmonary abnormalities. Non-physiological signal variability can be mitigated by measuring and mapping the nominal flip angle, and by rescaling the images to correct for signal bias and decay. While flip angle maps can be calculated from sequentially acquired images, scan time and breath-hold duration are doubled. Here, we exploit the low-frequency oversampling of 2D-spiral and keyhole reconstruction to measure flip angle maps from a single acquisition.
methodsFlip angle maps were calculated from two images generated from a single dataset using keyhole reconstructions and a Bloch-equation-based model suitable for hyperpolarized substances. Artifacts resulting from acquisition and reconstruction schemes (e.g., keyhole reconstruction radius, slice-selection profile, spiral-ordering, and oversampling) were assessed using point-spread functions. Simulated flip angle maps generated using keyhole reconstruction were compared against the paired-image approach using RMS error (RMSE). Finally, feasibility was demonstrated for in vivo xenon ventilation imaging.
resultsSimulations demonstrated accurate flip angle maps and B
conclusionRegional lung ventilation images with reduced impact of B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.