Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297266›Full record

Trial reportPopulation health metrics2024

Feasibility of caregiver-administered anthropometric measurements of children under age 5: evidence from Zambia.

Günther Fink, Mpela Chembe, Savanna Henderson, Peter C Rockers, Doug Parkerson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Population health metrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05120427 (The Impact of Growth Charts and Nutritional Supplements on Child Growth in Zambia), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05120427 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Growth Charts and Nutritional Supplements on Child Growth in Zambia: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ZamCharts)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Tropical & Public Health InstituteRan2020 to 2023Enrolled2,291ConditionsStuntingArmsLipid based nutrient Supplements (LNS):, Growth Charts
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Günther FinkSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute and University of Basel, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123, Allschwil, Basel, Switzerland. guenther.fink@swisstph.ch.
Mpela ChembeInnovations for Poverty Action Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Savanna HendersonInnovations for Poverty Action, Washington, DC, USA.
Peter C Rockers *School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, USA.
Doug Parkerson *Innovations for Poverty Action, New Haven, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate measurement of children's anthropometry is of central importance for the assessment of nutritional status as well as for the evaluation of nutrition-specific interventions. Social distancing requirements during the recent Covid-19 pandemic made administration of standard assessor-led measurement protocols infeasible in many settings, creating demand for alternative assessment modalities.

objectiveTo assess the feasibility and reliability of caregiver-administered anthropometric assessments of children under age 5.

designWe compared standard and caregiver-administered assessments within an ongoing nutrition trial in Zambia (NCT05120427). We developed a "no-contact" protocol whereby trained staff verbally instruct caregivers from an appropriate distance to measure the height, weight and MUAC of their children. We captured measurements of height, weight and MUAC among a sample of caregivers and infants in Zambia using both the "no-contact" protocol and a standard assessor-led protocol. We analyzed each anthropometric variable, comparing means between protocol group, the proportions yielding standardized z-scores outside the plausible ± 6SD range and the proportions of children classified stunted, underweight and wasted.

resultsAnthropometric measurements were captured for 76 children using both the no-contact protocol and the standard protocol. An additional 1430 children were assessed by the standard protocol only and an additional 748 children by the no-contact protocol only. For the 76 children measured by both methods, we find no differences in average height, weight and MUAC between caregivers and interviewer assessments. The estimated kappa for the binary stunting and underweight classifications were 0.84 and 0.93, respectively. In the larger samples measured only following one protocol, we find no differences in average outcomes after adjusting for child, caregiver and household characteristics.

conclusionsAnthropometric measurement protocols administered by caregivers with verbal instruction from trained assessors are a promising alternative to standard protocols in situations where study staff are unable to come in close contact with study participants. Clinical trials registration This study was conducted within a larger trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov as trial NCT05120427. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120427 .

Indexed as

CaregiversThinnessChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesHumansInfantNutritional StatusPandemicsReproducibility of ResultsZambiaAnthropometryCaregiver-administered measurementHeightMeasurementMUACSelf-measurementWeight

Identifiers

PMID38297266
PMCPMC10829329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.