Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297259›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

The role of self-efficacy in women's autonomy for health and nutrition decision-making in rural Bangladesh.

Allison P Salinger, Ellen Vermes, Jillian L Waid, Amanda S Wendt, Sarah J N Dupuis, Md Abul Kalam, Abdul Kader, Sheela S Sinharoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Allison P SalingerHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. asaling@emory.edu.
Ellen VermesDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jillian L WaidResearch Department 2, Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany.
Amanda S WendtResearch Department 2, Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany.
Sarah J N DupuisHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Md Abul KalamBangladesh Country Office, Helen Keller International, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abdul KaderBangladesh Country Office, Helen Keller International, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sheela S SinharoyHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgency - including the sub-domains of intrinsic agency, instrumental agency, and collective agency - is a critical component of the women's empowerment process. Self-efficacy (a component of intrinsic agency) may operate as a motivational influence for women to make choices according to their own preferences or goals, such that higher self-efficacy would be associated with more autonomous decision-making (a key component of instrumental agency).

methodsWe examine these relationships using mixed methods. We developed a series of decision-making autonomy indices, which captured alignment between the woman's reported and preferred roles in health and nutrition decisions. Using ordinal logistic regression, we assessed the relationship between generalized self-efficacy and decision-making autonomy.

resultsThere was a consistently positive association across all categories of decision-making, controlling for a number of individual and household-level covariates. In a sub-sample of joint decision-makers (i.e., women who reported making decisions with at least one other household member), we compared the association between generalized self-efficacy (i.e., one's overall belief in their ability to succeed) and decision-making autonomy to that of domain-specific self-efficacy (i.e., one's belief in their ability to achieve a specific goal) and decision-making autonomy. Across all decision-making categories, domain-specific self-efficacy was more strongly associated with decision-making autonomy than generalized self-efficacy. In-depth interviews provided additional context for interpretation of the regression analyses.

conclusionsThe results indicate the importance of the role of self-efficacy in the women's empowerment process, even in the traditionally female-controlled areas of health and nutrition decision-making. The development of the decision-making autonomy index is an important contribution to the literature in that it directly recognizes and captures the role of women's preferences regarding participation in decision-making.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsSelf EfficacyBangladeshDecision MakingEmpowermentFemaleHumansNutritional StatusPersonal AutonomyAgencyAgricultureMeasurementPreferenceWomen’s empowerment

Identifiers

PMID38297259
PMCPMC10832193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.