Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297244›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

Variations in respiratory and functional symptoms at four months after hospitalisation due to COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.

Monika Fagevik Olsén, Louise Lannefors, Ewa-Lena Johansson, Hanna C Persson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monika Fagevik OlsénDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Box 455, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30, Gothenburg, SE, Sweden. monika.fagevik-olsen@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0207-4105
Louise LanneforsDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Box 455, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30, Gothenburg, SE, Sweden.
Ewa-Lena JohanssonDepartment of Health and Rehabilitation/Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Box 455, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30, Gothenburg, SE, Sweden.
Hanna C PerssonDepartment of Physiotherapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, SE, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8633-3292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuch remains unknown about complex respiratory symptoms after COVID-19. Here we aimed to describe and analyse patients' various respiratory symptoms 4 months after discharge from hospitalisation for COVID-19, focusing on sex, previous pulmonary disease, and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

methodsThis cross-sectional study involved five hospitals and included 52 patients with self-assessed respiratory dysfunction at 4 months after discharge from hospitalisation for severe COVID-19. Their average age was 63 years, 38% were women, 15 had a previous diagnosed pulmonary disease, and 29 were current or previous smokers. Additionally, 31 had required intensive care-among whom 21 were intubated and 11 needed mechanical ventilation for ≥20 days. Respiratory function was tested concerning lung volumes, expiratory flow, muscle strength, physical capacity (including concurrent oxygen saturation), thoracic expansion, and respiratory movements.

resultsAmong 52 patients, 47 (90%) had one or several objectively measured respiratory function abnormalities. Decreased thoracic expansion was observed in 32 patients (62%), abnormal respiratory movements in 30 (58%), decreased vital capacity in 21 (40%), low physical function in 13 (26%), and desaturation during the test in 9 (17%). Respiratory inspiratory muscle strength was more commonly diminished than expiratory strength (27% vs. 8%). We did not observe differences between men and women, or between patients with versus without diagnosed pulmonary disease, except that those with pulmonary disease had significantly lower physical capacity assessed with 6MWD (70% vs. 88% predicted, p = 0.013). Compared to those who did not, patients who required ≥20 days of mechanical ventilation performed similarly on most tests, except that all thoracic breathing movements were significantly smaller (p < 0.05). The numbers and combinations of abnormal findings varied widely, without clear patterns.

conclusionPatients with remaining respiratory symptoms 4 months after discharge from hospitalization due to COVID-19 may suffer from various abnormal breathing functions, and dysfunctional breathing that is not detected using traditional measurements. These patients may benefit from multidimensional measuring of breathing movement, thoracic expansion, and respiratory muscle strength, along with traditional measurements, to assess their symptoms and enable prescription of optimal treatment interventions and rehabilitation.

trial registrationFoU i Sverige (Research & Development in Sweden, Registration number: 274476, registered 2020-05-28).

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesExhalationFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespirationBreathing patternDysfunctional breathingLong-COVIDPhysiotherapy evaluationPost-COVID conditionRespiratory symptoms

Identifiers

PMID38297244
PMCPMC10829323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.