ReviewBMC primary care2024
Characteristics of self-management education and support programmes for people with chronic diseases delivered by primary care teams: a rapid review.
Review in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardised training for reducing peritoneal dialysis-related infection: a cluster randomised controlled study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Healthcare Professionals' Experiences and Perspectives on Self-Management Education for Breast Cancer Survivors in Australian Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Self-management interventions in primary care practices in France between 2010 and 2022: a descriptive national study.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
- Development of a collaborative chronic care model for management of cardiometabolic disease in low- and middle-income countries.PloS one · 2026Article
- Health promotion and disease prevention: Advanced Practice Nursing competencies in women's health consultations.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Challenges and improvement strategies in the hospitalization of chronic multimorbid patients.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Review
- Implementation of Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) in Primary Care, as Perceived by Professionals: A Narrative Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Review
- Nursing consultation and diabetes: an educational and transformative process for primary health care.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2025Article
- Nurse-Led Interventions for Improving Medication Adherence in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Lack of Successful Implementation of Cancer Rehabilitation Guidelines: A Mixed-methods Study Highlighting Need for Better Preconditions in Primary Care.Integrative cancer therapiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care actors can play a major role in developing and promoting access to Self-Management Education and Support (SMES) programmes for people with chronic disease. We reviewed studies on SMES programmes in primary care by focusing on the following dimensions: models of SMES programmes in primary care, SMES team's composition, and participants' characteristics.
methodsFor this mixed-methods rapid review, we searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to identify articles in English and French that assessed a SMES programme in primary care for four main chronic diseases (diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease and/or respiratory chronic disease) and published between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2021. We excluded articles on non-original research and reviews. We evaluated the quality of the selected studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We reported the study results following the PRISMA guidelines.
resultsWe included 68 studies in the analysis. In 46/68 studies, a SMES model was described by focusing mainly on the organisational dimension (n = 24). The Chronic Care Model was the most used organisational model (n = 9). Only three studies described a multi-dimension model. In general, the SMES team was composed of two healthcare providers (mainly nurses), and partnerships with community actors were rarely reported. Participants were mainly patients with only one chronic disease. Only 20% of the described programmes took into account multimorbidity. Our rapid review focused on two databases and did not identify the SMES programme outcomes.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the limited implication of community actors and the infrequent inclusion of multimorbidity in the SMES programmes, despite the recommendations to develop a more interdisciplinary approach in SMES programmes. This rapid review identified areas of improvement for SMES programme development in primary care, especially the privileged place of nurses in their promotion.
trial registrationPROSPERO 2021 CRD42021268290 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.