Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297170›Full record

ArticleNature2024

Designing a circular carbon and plastics economy for a sustainable future.

Fernando Vidal, Eva R van der Marel, Ryan W F Kerr, Caitlin McElroy, Nadia Schroeder, Celia Mitchell, Gloria Rosetto, Thomas T D Chen, Richard M Bailey, Cameron Hepburn and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High-TAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Attractive NiAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fernando VidalDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-768X
Eva R van der MarelFaculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4543-6794
Ryan W F KerrDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8045-2060
Caitlin McElroySmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-6556
Nadia SchroederSmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Celia MitchellSmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gloria RosettoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Thomas T D ChenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard M BaileySchool of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4566-843X
Cameron HepburnSmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. cameron.hepburn@smithschool.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-7441
Catherine RedgwellFaculty of Law, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. catherine.redgwell@law.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5326-4649
Charlotte K WilliamsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. charlotte.williams@chem.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0734-1575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The linear production and consumption of plastics today is unsustainable. It creates large amounts of unnecessary and mismanaged waste, pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, undermining global climate targets and the Sustainable Development Goals. This Perspective provides an integrated technological, economic and legal view on how to deliver a circular carbon and plastics economy that minimizes carbon dioxide emissions. Different pathways that maximize recirculation of carbon (dioxide) between plastics waste and feedstocks are outlined, including mechanical, chemical and biological recycling, and those involving the use of biomass and carbon dioxide. Four future scenarios are described, only one of which achieves sufficient greenhouse gas savings in line with global climate targets. Such a bold system change requires 50% reduction in future plastic demand, complete phase-out of fossil-derived plastics, 95% recycling rates of retrievable plastics and use of renewable energy. It is hard to overstate the challenge of achieving this goal. We therefore present a roadmap outlining the scale and timing of the economic and legal interventions that could possibly support this. Assessing the service lifespan and recoverability of plastic products, along with considerations of sufficiency and smart design, can moreover provide design principles to guide future manufacturing, use and disposal of plastics.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutionGoalsPlasticsRecyclingSustainable DevelopmentBiomassCarbon DioxideFossil FuelsGlobal WarmingGreenhouse GasesRenewable EnergyTechnologyCarbon DioxideFossil FuelsGreenhouse GasesPlastics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.