Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297167›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2024

Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea exhibit differential nitrogen source preferences.

Wei Qin, Stephany P Wei, Yue Zheng, Eunkyung Choi, Xiangpeng Li, Juliet Johnston, Xianhui Wan, Britt Abrahamson, Zachary Flinkstrom, Baozhan Wang and 23 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative physiological and genomic characterization of a novelApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei Qin *School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA. weiqin@ou.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0895-0126
Stephany P Wei *Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yue Zheng *State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Eunkyung Choi *Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2266-310X
Xiangpeng LiSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Juliet JohnstonLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.
Xianhui WanDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4870-7369
Britt AbrahamsonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-5102
Zachary FlinkstromDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0596-6416
Baozhan WangCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-5730
Hanyan LiSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Lei HouSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Qing TaoSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Wyatt W ChlouberSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Xin SunDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-4283
Michael WellsSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0613-3843
Long NgoSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Kristopher A HuntDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0024-4913
Hidetoshi UrakawaDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Studies, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3748-6027
Xuanyu TaoSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Dongyu WangSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Xiaoyuan YanState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-4836
Dazhi WangState Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Chongle PanSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Peter K WeberLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-6050
Jiandong JiangCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4877-5756
Jizhong ZhouSchool of Biological Sciences, Institute for Environmental Genomics, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2014-0564
Yao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-4745
David A StahlDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bess B WardDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-2684
Xavier MayaliLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2170-0773
Willm Martens-HabbenaDepartment of Microbiology and Cell Science, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Davie, FL, USA. w.martenshabbena@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-9125
Mari-Karoliina H WinklerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. mwinkler@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8366-3293
University of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Washington · USXiamen University · CNLawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USNanjing Agricultural University · CNPrinceton University · USUniversity of Florida · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNFlorida Gulf Coast University · USYale University · US

Funding

DOE | Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy - U.S. Department of Energy) DE-SC0020356National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-1664052Simons Foundation 675459United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) HR0011-17-2-0064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOM) contribute to one of the largest nitrogen fluxes in the global nitrogen budget. Four distinct lineages of AOM: ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA), beta- and gamma-proteobacterial ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (β-AOB and γ-AOB) and complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox), are thought to compete for ammonia as their primary nitrogen substrate. In addition, many AOM species can utilize urea as an alternative energy and nitrogen source through hydrolysis to ammonia. How the coordination of ammonia and urea metabolism in AOM influences their ecology remains poorly understood. Here we use stable isotope tracing, kinetics and transcriptomics experiments to show that representatives of the AOM lineages employ distinct regulatory strategies for ammonia or urea utilization, thereby minimizing direct substrate competition. The tested AOA and comammox species preferentially used ammonia over urea, while β-AOB favoured urea utilization, repressed ammonia transport in the presence of urea and showed higher affinity for urea than for ammonia. Characterized γ-AOB co-utilized both substrates. These results reveal contrasting niche adaptation and coexistence patterns among the major AOM lineages.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaAmmoniaNitrificationNitrogenOxidation-ReductionPhylogenySoil MicrobiologyUreaAmmoniaNitrogenUrea

Identifiers

PMID38297167
OpenAlexW4391388329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.