ArticleScientific reports2024
Modeling mutation-specific arrhythmogenic phenotypes in isogenic human iPSC-derived cardiac tissues.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Review
- The RNA content of extracellular vesicles from gene-editedMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Integrating Prime Editing and Cellular Reprogramming as Novel Strategies for Genetic Cardiac Disease Modeling and Treatment.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- The Current State of Realistic Heart Models for Disease Modelling and Cardiotoxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Advances in induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes: technological breakthroughs, key discoveries and new applications.The Journal of physiology · 2024Review
- Stem Cell Therapy against Ischemic Heart Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) for modeling cardiac arrhythmias: strengths, challenges and potential solutions.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Synthetic embryology of the human heart.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Disease modeling using human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) from patients with genetic disease is a powerful approach for dissecting pathophysiology and drug discovery. Nevertheless, isogenic controls are required to precisely compare phenotypic outcomes from presumed causative mutations rather than differences in genetic backgrounds. Moreover, 2D cellular models often fail to exhibit authentic disease phenotypes resulting in poor validation in vitro. Here we show that a combination of precision gene editing and bioengineered 3D tissue models can establish advanced isogenic hiPSC-derived cardiac disease models, overcoming these drawbacks. To model inherited cardiac arrhythmias we selected representative N588D and N588K missense mutations affecting the same codon in the hERG potassium channel gene KCNH2, which are reported to cause long (LQTS) and short (SQTS) QT syndromes, respectively. We generated compound heterozygous variants in normal hiPSCs, and differentiated cardiomyocytes (CMs) and mesenchymal cells (MCs) to form 3D cardiac tissue sheets (CTSs). In hiPSC-derived CM monolayers and 3D CTSs, electrophysiological analysis with multielectrode arrays showed prolonged and shortened repolarization, respectively, compared to the isogenic controls. When pharmacologically inhibiting the hERG channels, mutant 3D CTSs were differentially susceptible to arrhythmic events than the isogenic controls. Thus, this strategy offers advanced disease models that can reproduce clinically relevant phenotypes and provide solid validation of gene mutations in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.