Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297016›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2024

Toripalimab plus capecitabine in the treatment of patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial.

Xun Cao, Hao-Yang Huang, Chi-Xiong Liang, Zhuo-Chen Lin, Jia-Yu Zhou, Xi Chen, Ying-Ying Huang, Ze-Jiang Zhan, Liang-Ru Ke, Lu-Jun Han and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Residual Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xun Cao *Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-1501
Hao-Yang Huang *Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Chi-Xiong Liang *Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuo-Chen LinDepartment of Medical Records, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jia-Yu ZhouDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Ying-Ying HuangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China/Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy/Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Ze-Jiang ZhanDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Liang-Ru KeState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China/Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy/Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Lu-Jun HanState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China/Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine/Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy/Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Wei-Xiong XiaDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Lin-Quan TangDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Shan-Shan GuoDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Hu LiangDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang GuoDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Xing LvDepartment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China. lvxing@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3125-6853
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81872375National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82172863Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2019B110233004Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2021A1515010118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma after receiving definitive treatment have poor prognoses. Although immune checkpoint therapies have achieved breakthroughs for treating recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, none of these strategies have been assessed for treating residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In this single-arm, phase 2 trial, we aimed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy and safety of toripalimab (anti-PD1 antibody) plus capecitabine in patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma after definitive treatment (ChiCTR1900023710). Primary endpoint of this trial was the objective response rate assessed according to RECIST (version 1.1). Secondary endpoints included complete response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, safety profile, and treatment compliance. Between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021, 23 patients were recruited and received six cycles of toripalimab plus capecitabine every 3 weeks. In efficacy analyses, 13 patients (56.5%) had complete response, and 9 patients (39.1%) had partial response, with an objective response rate of 95.7% (95% CI 78.1-99.9). The trial met its prespecified primary endpoint. In safety analyses, 21 of (91.3%) 23 patients had treatment-related adverse events. The most frequently reported adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (11 patients [47.8%]). The most common grade 3 adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (two patients [8.7%]). No grades 4-5 treatment-related adverse events were recorded. This phase 2 trial shows that combining toripalimab with capecitabine has promising antitumour activity and a manageable safety profile for patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHand-Foot SyndromeNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCapecitabinetoripalimab

Identifiers

PMID38297016
PMCPMC10831082
OpenAlexW4391380408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.