Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automated deep learning model for estimating intraoperative blood loss using gauze images.

Dan Yoon, Mira Yoo, Byeong Soo Kim, Young Gyun Kim, Jong Hyeon Lee, Eunju Lee, Guan Hong Min, Du-Yeong Hwang, Changhoon Baek, Minwoo Cho and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Dan Yoon *Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Mira Yoo *Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 13620, Korea.
Byeong Soo KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Young Gyun KimInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Jong Hyeon LeeInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Eunju LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 13620, Korea.
Guan Hong MinDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 13620, Korea.
Du-Yeong HwangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 13620, Korea.
Changhoon BaekDepartment of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Minwoo ChoDepartment of Transdisciplinary Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Yun-Suhk SuhDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 13620, Korea. ysksuh@gmail.com.
Sungwan KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea. sungwan@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Medical Device Development Fund 1711179421Seoul National University Hospital 1920230020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), an essential parameter for perioperative management, has been evaluated by manually weighing blood in gauze and suction bottles, a process both time-consuming and labor-intensive. As the novel EBL prediction platform, we developed an automated deep learning EBL prediction model, utilizing the patch-wise crumpled state (P-W CS) of gauze images with texture analysis. The proposed algorithm was developed using animal data obtained from a porcine experiment and validated on human intraoperative data prospectively collected from 102 laparoscopic gastric cancer surgeries. The EBL prediction model involves gauze area detection and subsequent EBL regression based on the detected areas, with each stage optimized through comparative model performance evaluations. The selected gauze detection model demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.5% and a specificity of 98.0%. Based on this detection model, the performance of EBL regression stage models was compared. Comparative evaluations revealed that our P-W CS-based model outperforms others, including one reliant on convolutional neural networks and another analyzing the gauze's overall crumpled state. The P-W CS-based model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.25 g and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 7.26% in EBL regression. Additionally, per-patient assessment yielded an MAE of 0.58 g, indicating errors < 1 g/patient. In conclusion, our algorithm provides an objective standard and streamlined approach for EBL estimation during surgery without the need for perioperative approximation and additional tasks by humans. The robust performance of the model across varied surgical conditions emphasizes its clinical potential for real-world application.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalDeep LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsBandagesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSwine

Identifiers

PMID38297011
PMCPMC10830489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.