Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38297001›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A gene expression-based classifier for HER2-low breast cancer.

Serena Di Cosimo, Sara Pizzamiglio, Chiara Maura Ciniselli, Valeria Duroni, Vera Cappelletti, Loris De Cecco, Cinzia De Marco, Marco Silvestri, Maria Carmen De Santis, Andrea Vingiani and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serena Di CosimoDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Sara PizzamiglioBioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. sara.pizzamiglio@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Chiara Maura CiniselliBioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Valeria DuroniBioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Vera CappellettiDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Loris De CeccoMolecular Mechanisms Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia De MarcoDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marco SilvestriDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Maria Carmen De SantisRadiation Oncology 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Andrea VingianiDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Biagio PaoliniDepartment of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Rosaria OrlandiMolecular Targeting Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marilena Valeria IorioMolecular Targeting Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo PruneriDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Paolo VerderioBioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In clinical trials evaluating antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs), HER2-low breast cancer is defined through protein immunohistochemistry scoring (IHC) 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification. However, in daily practice, the accuracy of IHC is compromised by inter-observer variability. Herein, we aimed to identify HER2-low breast cancer primary tumors by leveraging gene expression profiling. A discovery approach was applied to gene expression profile of institutional INT1 (n = 125) and INT2 (n = 84) datasets. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each specific HER2 IHC category 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+. Principal Component Analysis was used to generate a HER2-low signature whose performance was evaluated in the independent INT3 (n = 95), and in the publicly available TCGA and GSE81538 datasets. The association between the HER2-low signature and HER2 IHC categories was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pair-wise comparisons. The HER2-low signature discriminatory capability was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses were performed to evaluate the HER2-low signature genes functional enrichment. A HER2-low signature was computed based on HER2 IHC category-specific DEGs. The twenty genes included in the signature were significantly enriched with lipid and steroid metabolism pathways, peptidase regulation, and humoral immune response. The HER2-low signature values showed a bell-shaped distribution across IHC categories (low values in 0 and 3+; high values in 1+ and 2+), effectively distinguishing HER2-low from 0 (p < 0.001) to 3+ (p < 0.001). Notably, the signature values were higher in tumors scored with 1+ as compared to 0. The HER2-low signature association with IHC categories and its bell-shaped distribution was confirmed in the independent INT3, TCGA and GSE81538 datasets. In the combined INT1 and INT3 datasets, the HER2-low signature achieved an AUC value of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.67-0.81) in distinguishing HER2-low vs. the other categories, outperforming the individual ERBB2 mRNA AUC value of 0.52 (95% CI 0.43-0.60). These results represent a proof-of-concept for an observer-independent gene-expression-based classifier of HER2-low status. The herein identified 20-gene signature shows promise in distinguishing between HER2 0 and HER2-low expressing tumors, including those scored as 1+ at IHC, and in developing a selection approach for ADCs candidates.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene ExpressionGenes, erbB-2HumansImmunohistochemistryBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID38297001
PMCPMC10830477
OpenAlexW4391445448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.