Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38296981›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Anti-CRISPR Anopheles mosquitoes inhibit gene drive spread under challenging behavioural conditions in large cages.

Rocco D'Amato, Chrysanthi Taxiarchi, Marco Galardini, Alessandro Trusso, Roxana L Minuz, Silvia Grilli, Alastair G T Somerville, Dammy Shittu, Ahmad S Khalil, Roberto Galizi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CRISPR/Cas9-germline editing ofScience advances · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Rocco D'AmatoGenetics and Ecology Research Centre, Polo of Genomics, Genetics and Biology (Polo GGB), Terni, Italy.
Chrysanthi TaxiarchiDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6616-5241
Marco GalardiniBiological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2018-8242
Alessandro TrussoGenetics and Ecology Research Centre, Polo of Genomics, Genetics and Biology (Polo GGB), Terni, Italy.
Roxana L MinuzGenetics and Ecology Research Centre, Polo of Genomics, Genetics and Biology (Polo GGB), Terni, Italy.
Silvia GrilliDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alastair G T SomervilleDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Dammy ShittuDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ahmad S KhalilBiological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8214-0546
Roberto GaliziCentre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-7480
Andrea CrisantiDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2406-4426
Alekos Simoni *Genetics and Ecology Research Centre, Polo of Genomics, Genetics and Biology (Polo GGB), Terni, Italy. a.simoni@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8629-721X
Ruth Müller *Genetics and Ecology Research Centre, Polo of Genomics, Genetics and Biology (Polo GGB), Terni, Italy. r.muller@itg.be.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) OPP1210755Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) EXC 2155-390874280United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) HR0011-17-2-0042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based gene drives have the potential to spread within populations and are considered as promising vector control tools. A doublesex-targeting gene drive was able to suppress laboratory Anopheles mosquito populations in small and large cages, and it is considered for field application. Challenges related to the field-use of gene drives and the evolving regulatory framework suggest that systems able to modulate or revert the action of gene drives, could be part of post-release risk-mitigation plans. In this study, we challenge an AcrIIA4-based anti-drive to inhibit gene drive spread in age-structured Anopheles gambiae population under complex feeding and behavioural conditions. A stochastic model predicts the experimentally-observed genotype dynamics in age-structured populations in medium-sized cages and highlights the necessity of large-sized cage trials. These experiments and experimental-modelling framework demonstrate the effectiveness of the anti-drive in different scenarios, providing further corroboration for its use in controlling the spread of gene drive in Anopheles.

Indexed as

AnophelesGene Drive TechnologyMalariaAnimalsMosquito ControlMosquito Vectors

Identifiers

PMID38296981
PMCPMC10830555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.