Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Jianyu LiThe Education Ministry Key Lab of Resource Chemistry, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Biomimetic Catalysis and Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3934-4930
Sheng GongThe Education Ministry Key Lab of Resource Chemistry, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Biomimetic Catalysis and Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.
Shaolun GaoThe Education Ministry Key Lab of Resource Chemistry, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Biomimetic Catalysis and Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.
Jianfeng ChenThe Education Ministry Key Lab of Resource Chemistry, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Biomimetic Catalysis and Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China. jfchen@shnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-1651
Wen-Wen ChenThe Education Ministry Key Lab of Resource Chemistry, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Biomimetic Catalysis and Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2723-2843
Baoguo ZhaoThe Education Ministry Key Lab of Resource Chemistry, Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Biomimetic Catalysis and Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China. zhaobg2006@shnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7579-6670
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22271192National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22301182Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission) 20JC1416800Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission) 22ZR1445100
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Primary alkyl amines are highly reactive in N-nucleophilic reactions with electrophiles. However, their α-C-H bonds are unreactive towards electrophiles due to their extremely low acidity (pK
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.