Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38296849›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2024

Validating the safety of low-dose CTPA in pregnancy: results from the OPTICA (Optimised CT Pulmonary Angiography in Pregnancy) Study.

Ciara D Gillespie, Andrew Yates, Mark Hughes, Karl Ewins, Gabriella McMahon, John Hynes, Mark C Murphy, Marie Galligan, Sebastian Vencken, Ekele Alih and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04179487 (The OPTICA Study - A Prospective Study Assessing the Quality and Safety of an Optimised CTPA Protocol in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04179487 unknown statusnot on this map

The OPTICA Study - A Prospective Study Assessing the Quality and Safety of an Optimised CTPA Protocol in Pregnancy

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College DublinRan2018 to 2024Enrolled464ConditionsPulmonary Embolism, Pregnancy Related, Venous ThromboembolismArmsOPTICA CTPA Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Pregnancy-Related Cardiovascular Diseases: A Radiological Overview.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ciara D GillespieDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland. ciaragillespiemmuh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3006-1467
Andrew YatesDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Mark HughesDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Karl EwinsDepartment of Haematology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Gabriella McMahonDepartment of Obstetrics, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, D01 P5W9, Ireland.
John HynesDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Mark C MurphyDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Marie GalliganClinical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Sebastian VenckenClinical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Ekele AlihClinical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
John VardenDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Jennifer DonnellyDepartment of Obstetrics, Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, D01 P5W9, Ireland.
Ferdia BolsterDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Michael RowanDepartment of Medical Physics, St James Hospital, Dublin, D08 NHY1, Ireland.
Shane FoleyRadiography & Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Fionnuala NíAinleDepartment of Haematology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
Peter J MacMahonDepartment of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Whitty Building, North Circular Road, Dublin 7, Dublin, D07 R2WY, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IERotunda Hospital · IESt. James's Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality. CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is the first-line advanced imaging modality for suspected PE in pregnancy at institutes offering low-dose techniques; however, a protocol balancing safety with low dose remains undefined. The wide range of CTPA doses reported in pregnancy suggests a lack of confidence in implementing low-dose techniques in this group. PURPOSE: To define and validate the safety, radiation dose and image quality of a low-dose CTPA protocol optimised for pregnancy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe OPTICA study is a prospective observational study. Pregnant study participants with suspected PE underwent the same CTPA protocol between May 2018 and February 2022. The primary outcome, CTPA safety, was judged by the reference standard; the 3-month incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in study participants with a negative index CTPA. Secondary outcomes defined radiation dose and image quality. Absorbed breast, maternal effective and fetal doses were estimated by Monte-Carlo simulation on gestation-matched phantoms. Image quality was assessed by signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios and a Likert score for pulmonary arterial enhancement.

resultsA total of 116 CTPAs were performed in 113 pregnant women of which 16 CTPAs were excluded. PE was diagnosed on 1 CTPA and out-ruled in 99. The incidence of recurrent symptomatic VTE was 0.0% (one-sided 95% CI, 2.66%) at follow-up. The mean absorbed breast dose was 2.9 ± 2.1mGy, uterine/fetal dose was 0.1 ± 0.2mGy and maternal effective dose was 1.4 ± 0.9mSv. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was 11.9 ± 3.7. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was 10.4 ± 3.5.

conclusionThe OPTICA CTPA protocol safely excluded PE in pregnant women across all trimesters, with low fetal and maternal radiation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: OPTICA (Optimised CT Pulmonary Angiography in Pregnancy) is the first prospective study to define the achievable radiation dose, image-quality and safety of a low-dose CT pulmonary angiogram protocol optimised for pregnancy (NCT04179487). It provides the current benchmark for safe and achievable CT pulmonary angiogram doses in the pregnant population. KEY POINTS: • Despite the increased use of CT pulmonary angiogram in pregnancy, an optimised low-dose protocol has not been defined and reported doses in pregnancy continue to vary widely. • The OPTICA (Optimised CT Pulmonary Angiography in Pregnancy) study prospectively defines the achievable dose, image quality and safety of a low-dose CT pulmonary angiogram protocol using widely available technology. • OPTICA provides a benchmark for safe and achievable CT pulmonary angiogram doses in the pregnant population.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPulmonary EmbolismRadiation DosageAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioComputed tomography angiographyPregnancyPulmonary embolismRadiation dosageVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID38296849
OpenAlexW4391383090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.