Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38296595›Full record

Observational studyJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

No detrimental association between antibiotic use and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: an observational cohort study comparing patients with ICI-treated and TKI-treated melanoma and NSCLC.

Marjolein Metselaar-Albers, Irma Meijerman, Ferdi Engels, John Haanen, Jos Beijnen, Arief Lalmohamed

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marjolein Metselaar-AlbersUtrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands m.h.m.metselaar-albers@uu.nl.ORCID 0009-0005-3648-8161
Irma MeijermanUtrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ferdi EngelsUtrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
John HaanenMedical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Nederlands Kanker Instituut, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5884-7704
Jos BeijnenUtrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Arief LalmohamedUtrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of antibiotics in malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remains unclear. Several studies suggested a detrimental impact of antibiotic use on the response to ICI, but were susceptible to confounding by indication. Our objective was therefore to assess whether the relationship between antibiotic use and ICI response is causative or merely associative.

methodsA large, single-center observational cohort study was performed with individuals treated for either non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) or metastatic melanoma. An effect modification approach was used, aiming to estimate the association between antibiotic use and overall survival (OS) and compare these estimates between individuals receiving first-line ICI treatment versus those receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Exposure of interest was antibiotic use within 30 days before the start of anticancer treatment. HRs for OS were estimated for antibiotics versus no antibiotics in each cohort using multivariable propensity adjusted analysis. The "true antibiotic effect" within the ICI versus TKI cohort was modeled using an interaction term.

resultsA total of 4534 patients were included, of which 1908 in the ICI cohort and 817 in the TKI cohort. Approximately 10% of patients in each cohort used antibiotics within 30 days before the start of anticancer treatment. Our results demonstrate a lack of synergistic interaction between current antibiotic use and ICI therapy in relation to OS: although antibiotic use was significantly associated with OS decline in the ICI cohort (HR=1.26 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.51)), a similar magnitude in OS decline was found within the TKI cohort (HR=1.24 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.62)). This was reflected by the synergy index (HR=0.96 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.31)), which implied no synergistic interaction between current antibiotic use and ICI.

conclusionThis study strongly suggests that there is no causal detrimental association between antibiotic use and ICI therapy outcome when looking at OS in individuals with malignant melanoma or NSCLC. The frequently observed inverse association between antibiotics and ICI response in previous studies is most likely driven by confounding by indication, which was confirmed by the findings in our reference TKI cohort.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsMelanomaAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Identifiers

PMID38296595
PMCPMC10831429
OpenAlexW4391383613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.