Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38296502›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2024

Spontaneous haemoperitoneum in the second trimester of pregnancy.

Karen Carlson, Sandy Montoya

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen CarlsonOb Gyn, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA kscarlson@unmc.edu.
Sandy MontoyaOb Gyn, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is a case of a spontaneous haemoperitoneum occurring in the second trimester of pregnancy which was managed with interventional radiology to avoid laparotomy and its potential consequences. We aim to raise awareness of this condition in pregnancy because the perinatal mortality rate is as high as 36%. Spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) has frequently been associated with vascular rupture from pre-existing endometriosis. Most cases of SHiP have been managed with laparotomy. However, transcatheter embolisation can impart lifesaving alternatives to more invasive interventions when caring for pregnant patients. More judicious use of imaging procedures may also help improve diagnostic and therapeutic pathways with SHiP. We recommend that high-risk pregnancies are managed in level IV regional perinatal healthcare centres, when possible, where subspecialists and alternative measures of management exist.

Indexed as

EndometriosisPregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHemoperitoneumHumansPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskPregnancy Trimester, SecondInterventional radiologyMaterno-fetal medicinePregnancyRadiologyUrinary and genital tract disorders

Identifiers

PMID38296502
PMCPMC10831445
OpenAlexW4391383568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.