ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Validation of a Recently Developed Fluoroscopic Video Analysis Workstation (Radwisp™) for the Reliable Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Radwisp™ is a fluoroscopic video analysis workstation recently developed to evaluate pulmonary circulation, thereby obviating the need for contrast medium or breath-holding. This study validated Radwisp as a diagnostic tool for acute pulmonary embolism (APE) and evaluated its potential utility in patients with symptoms of suspected APE. Methods The study included 10 patients (mean age, 69±16 years old) who were admitted to our hospital for suspected APE based on symptoms and physical examination findings between January 2020 and April 2021. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and cineradiography, based on standard radiographs for the creation of a Radwisp image, were performed on the same day. Of the 10 cases of suspected APE, 7 were definitively diagnosed by CT with APE, and 3 were definitively diagnosed as not having APE. Fifty physicians (25 cardiologists and 25 residents) were blinded to patient information and CT images and asked to diagnose the presence of APE based solely on the Radwisp images. Results A total of 250 diagnoses were made by cardiologists and 250 by residents. Among the cardiologists, the sensitivity and specificity of the Radwisp-based analysis were 91% and 48%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 80% and 69%, respectively. Among the residents, the sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 35%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values were 76% and 55%, respectively. Conclusion This study showed an initial validation of Radwisp for diagnosing APE, revealing a high sensitivity but not yet achieving a high specificity. Further studies with a larger number of cases are needed to thoroughly evaluate the diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.