ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024
Time-Saving 3D MR Imaging Protocols with Millimeter and Submillimeter Isotropic Spatial Resolution for Face and Neck Imaging as Implemented at a Single-Site Major Referral Center.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caution Comparing Transoral Ultrasonography With Postbiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MR imaging has become the routine technique for staging nasopharyngeal carcinoma, evaluating perineural tumor spread, and detecting cartilage invasion in laryngeal carcinoma. However, these protocols traditionally require in the range of 25 to 35 minutes of acquisition time. 3D sequences offer the potential advantage of time savings through the acquisition of 1-mm or submillimeter resolution isotropic data followed by multiplanar reformats that require no further imaging time. We have iteratively optimized vendor product 3D T1-weighted MR imaging sequences for morphologic face and neck imaging, reducing the average acquisition time of our 3T protocols by 9 minutes 57 seconds (40.9%) and of our 1.5T protocols by 9 minutes 5 seconds (37.0%), while simultaneously maintaining or improving spatial resolution. This clinical report describes our experience optimizing and implementing commercially available 3D T1-weighted MR imaging pulse sequence protocols for clinical face and neck MR imaging examinations using illustrative cases. We provide protocol details to allow others to replicate our implementations, and we report challenges we faced along with our solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.