Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38296278›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

What is the coverage of retina screening services for people with diabetes? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nimisha Chabba, Pushkar Raj Silwal, Covadonga Bascaran, Ian McCormick, Lucy Goodman, Iris Gordon, Matthew J Burton, Stuart Keel, Jennifer Evans, Jacqueline Ramke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Nimisha ChabbaSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand nimisha.chabba@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0009-0009-2863-7322
Pushkar Raj SilwalSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6100-090X
Covadonga BascaranInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ian McCormickInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7360-3844
Lucy GoodmanSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Iris GordonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Stuart KeelDepartment of Noncommunicable Disease, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jennifer EvansInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jacqueline RamkeSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5764-1306
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PK

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of vision impairment globally. Vision loss from diabetic retinopathy can generally be prevented by early detection and timely treatment. The WHO included a measure of service access for diabetic retinopathy as a core indicator in the Eye Care Indicator Menu launched in 2022: METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A search will be conducted in five databases without language restrictions for studies from any country reporting retina screening coverage for adults with any type of diabetes at the national or subnational level using data collected since 1 January 2000 until the search date. We will also seek reports and coverage statistics from government websites of all WHO member states. Two investigators will independently screen studies, extract relevant data and assess risk of bias of included studies. The results of the review will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guideline. We will summarise the range of coverage definitions reported across included studies and present the median retina screening coverage in WHO regions and by World Bank country income level. Depending on the availability of data, we will conduct meta-analysis to assess disparities in retina screening coverage for people with diabetes by factors in the PROGRESS framework (Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status and Social capital). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will only include published data thus no ethical approval will be sought. The findings of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: OSF registration 17/10/2023: https://osf.io/k5p69.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignRetinaReview Literature as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicVision DisordersDiabetic retinopathyGeneral diabetesMass Screening

Identifiers

PMID38296278
PMCPMC10828834
OpenAlexW4391405453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.