ArticleThe journal of pain2024
The Moderating Effects of Cognitive Processes on Pain-related Outcomes.
Article in The journal of pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Esmolol as an Adjunct in Multimodal Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Opioid-Sparing and Analgesic Effects.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2026Pooled it
- PTSD treatment impacts on pain: secondary analysis of sertraline, prolonged exposure, and their combination.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although evidence supports the importance of pain-related thoughts (ie, cognitive content, or what people think) as predictors of pain and pain-related function, evidence regarding the role of cognitive processes (ie, how people think about pain, eg, by accepting pain, not making judgments about pain, or being absorbed by the pain experience) in adjustment to chronic pain is in its early stages. Using baseline data from a clinical trial of individuals with chronic low back pain (N = 327), the study aimed to increase knowledge regarding the associations between cognitive processes, pain intensity, pain interference, and depression. The results indicate that a number of cognitive processes are significantly related to pain intensity when controlling for catastrophizing, although the pattern of associations found was opposite to those anticipated. One cognitive process (pain absorption) was found to be significantly associated with pain interference, and 9 of 10 cognitive processes were significantly associated with depression when controlling for catastrophizing. In each case, the processes thought to be adaptive were negatively associated with pain interference and depression, and processes thought to be maladaptive evidenced the opposite pattern. The findings are consistent with-but do not prove, given the cross-sectional nature of the data-the possibility that cognitive processes play an important role in adjustment to chronic pain. The potential role these variables play in depression was particularly noteworthy. Longitudinal and experimental studies to evaluate the causal nature of the associations identified are warranted. PERSPECTIVE: The study findings highlight the potential importance of cognitive process variables (ie, how people think) in adjustment to chronic pain. Research to evaluate cognitive processes as potential mechanism variables in pain treatment is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.