ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024
Clinical Laboratory Investigations and Antivenom Administration after Malayan Pit Viper (Calloselasma rhodostoma) Envenoming: A Retrospective Study from Southernmost Thailand.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Snake envenomation and acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Differential Hematotoxic Activity of Southeast Asian Pit Viper Venoms: The Cross-Neutralizing Effect of Available Antivenoms.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Early Clinical Approach Prevents Severe Neurotoxicity Following Cobra Envenoming: An Integrated Experimental and Multi-Center Clinical Study in Thailand.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Basic research on antitoxin profiles: a key link to the management of snakebites.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Malayan pit viper (MPV: Calloselasma rhodostoma) is a medically important venomous snake causing numerous envenomations in Thailand. Administration of specific snake antivenom is the only effective treatment for MPV-envenomed patients. However, inappropriate administration or misuse of snake antivenom is problematic in some remote areas of tropical countries where the snakebite envenoming rate is notable. Currently, the indications for administration of MPV antivenom are focused mainly on hematological factors. These include 1) venous clotting time > 20 min, 2) unclotted 20-minute whole-blood clotting time, 3) international normalized ratio > 1.2, 4) platelet count < 50 × 103/μL, 5) systemic bleeding, and 6) impending compartment syndrome. We aimed to determine the association between laboratory data and antivenom administration in MPV-envenomed patients. A retrospective study of data from 2016 to 2021 in Narathiwat Province, the southernmost province in Thailand, was conducted. A total of 838 MPV-bitten patients were included in this study. Local effects and systemic effects were observed in 58.8% and 27.7% of patients, respectively. Coagulopathies, which range from abnormal blood clotting to systemic bleeding, represented the majority of systemic effects. Acute kidney injury developed in 2.5% of patients. In this study, 57.3% of patients were considered appropriate antivenom recipients. Interestingly, the present study revealed that local bleeding and mild to moderate thrombocytopenia became the independent factors for inappropriate use of MPV antivenom. Reeducation and supervision regarding the rational use of snake antivenom are needed to minimize the misuse of antivenom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.