ArticleBlood advances2024
Clinical features of neurotoxicity after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in mantle cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in asia: redefining the role of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Cognitive Assessment After CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Determinants of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Success: In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Assessment.Cancers · 2026Review
- CAR T-cells in hematologic malignancies: Advances, challenges, and future directions.iScience · 2026Review
- Imaging Immunotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in pediatric neurological autoimmune diseases: mechanisms, clinical applications, and future perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Routine prophylaxis with levetiracetam offers no benefit in CD19 CAR-T for LBCL: a multicenter propensity-matched study.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging Findings of CAR T-Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity: A Review.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Review
- CD19 -targeted CAR T therapy treating hematologic malignancies: hidden danger is the next neighbor to security?Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Endothelial dysfunction and hemostatic imbalance in CAR T-cell-associated toxicities: pathophysiological insights and the role of circulating biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Celebrating a year of immunotherapy/cell and gene therapy in Blood Advances.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Systemic toxicity of CAR-T therapy and potential monitoring indicators for toxicity prevention.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractCD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has proven highly effective for treating relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) remains a significant concern. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, radiological, and laboratory correlatives associated with ICANS development after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with MCL. All patients (N = 26) who received standard-of-care brexucabtagene autoleucel until July 2022 at our institution were evaluated. Laboratory and radiographic correlatives including brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG) were evaluated to determine the clinical impact of ICANS. Seventeen (65%) patients experienced ICANS after treatment, with a median onset on day 6. Ten (38%) patients experienced severe (grade ≥3) ICANS. All patients with ICANS had antecedent cytokine release syndrome (CRS), but no correlation was observed between ICANS severity and CRS grade. Overall, 92% of EEGs revealed interictal changes; no patients experienced frank seizures because of ICANS. In total, 86% of patients with severe ICANS with postinfusion brain MRIs demonstrated acute neuroimaging findings not seen on pretreatment MRI. Severe ICANS was also associated with higher rates of cytopenia, coagulopathy, increased cumulative steroid exposure, and prolonged hospitalization. However, severe ICANS did not affect treatment outcomes of patients with MCL. Severe ICANS is frequently associated with a range of postinfusion brain MRI changes and abnormal EEG findings. Longer hospitalization was observed in patients with severe ICANS, especially those with abnormal acute MRI or EEG findings, but there was no discernible impact on overall treatment response and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.