Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38295151›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Model-Informed Clinical Pharmacology Profile of a Novel Fixed-Dose Combination of Nivolumab and Relatlimab in Adult and Adolescent Patients with Solid Tumors.

Yue Zhao, Zheyi Hu, Sai Praneeth Bathena, Sarah Keidel, Karen Miller-Moslin, Paul Statkevich, Akintunde Bello, Amit Roy, Satyendra Suryawanshi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Scoping review of the role of pharmacometrics in model-informed drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yue ZhaoBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-0134
Zheyi HuBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-1927
Sai Praneeth BathenaBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0009-0008-8377-9879
Sarah KeidelBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-1451
Karen Miller-MoslinBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0009-0008-8969-3267
Paul StatkevichBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0002-8774-2095
Akintunde BelloBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0009-0007-5186-3577
Amit RoyBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0003-2140-1455
Satyendra SuryawanshiBristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0009-0002-8657-4760
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProgression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with nivolumab 480 mg plus relatlimab 160 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) every 4 weeks (Q4W) versus nivolumab alone in patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma in RELATIVITY-047. In addition, RELATIVITY-020 (Part D) demonstrated a manageable safety profile and potential for durable response with nivolumab plus relatlimab in previously treated patients. Here, we evaluate the clinical pharmacology profile (CPP) of nivolumab plus relatlimab to support the approved regimen for adult and adolescent patients with advanced melanoma and its continued clinical development in solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL

designThe pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of relatlimab and nivolumab were assessed using data from RELATIVITY-047 and RELATIVITY-020. Patients with advanced solid tumors received relatlimab alone or nivolumab plus relatlimab as single-agent vials (SAV) or FDC. PK was characterized using a population PK (popPK) model.

resultsRelatlimab demonstrated nonlinear and time-varying PK. Nonlinearity in relatlimab PK represented approximately 31% of total CL of relatlimab 160 mg Q4W. Relatlimab PK was dose proportional at doses ≥160 mg Q4W. Geometric mean exposures were similar for SAV and FDC cohorts receiving equivalent dosing regimens. No dose adjustment was required for covariates. Incidence of relatlimab antidrug antibodies was <6% for nivolumab plus relatlimab and had no clinically meaningful impact. There was no PK-related drug interaction of nivolumab plus relatlimab.

conclusionsThe CPP of relatlimab alone or in combination with nivolumab supports the approved dosing in advanced melanoma and the continued evaluation of nivolumab and relatlimab across other solid tumors. See related commentary by Gopalakrishnan and Amaria, p. 2862.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoplasmsNivolumabAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID38295151
PMCPMC11247312
OpenAlexW4391380732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.