Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38294867›Full record

ArticleGut microbes

Longitudinal analysis of the gut microbiome in adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa: microbiome-related factors associated with clinical outcome.

Nadia Andrea Andreani, Arunabh Sharma, Brigitte Dahmen, Hannah E Specht, Nina Mannig, Vanessa Ruan, Lara Keller, John F Baines, Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann, Astrid Dempfle and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Anorexia nervosa: 150 years of critical theory.Journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Microbiome: A Key Regulator of Body-Brain Interactions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia Andrea AndreaniSection of Evolutionary Medicine, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-9874
Arunabh SharmaInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7808-0942
Brigitte DahmenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Hannah E SpechtDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Nina MannigDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Vanessa RuanDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Lara KellerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
John F BainesSection of Evolutionary Medicine, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-4909
Beate Herpertz-DahlmannDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-3323
Astrid DempfleInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-3920
Jochen SeitzDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0110-7980
RWTH Aachen University · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is mounting evidence regarding the role of gut microbiota in anorexia nervosa (AN). Previous studies have reported that patients with AN show dysbiosis compared to healthy controls (HCs); however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear, and data on influencing factors and longitudinal course of microbiome changes are scarce. Here, we present longitudinal data of 57 adolescent inpatients diagnosed with AN at up to nine time points (including a 1-year follow-up examination) and compare these to up to six time points in 34 HCs. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to investigate the microbiome composition of fecal samples, and data on food intake, weight change, hormonal recovery (leptin levels), and clinical outcomes were recorded. Differences in microbiome composition compared to HCs were greatest during acute starvation and in the low-weight group, while diminishing with weight gain and especially weight recovery at the 1-year follow-up. Illness duration and prior weight loss were strongly associated with microbiome composition at hospital admission, whereas microbial changes during treatment were associated with kilocalories consumed, weight gain, and hormonal recovery. The microbiome at admission was prognostic for hospital readmission, and a higher abundance of

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAdolescentHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWeight GainRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sadolescentsanorexia nervosaeating disordergut-brain axisillness durationlongitudinal studylong-term follow-uplow-weight patientsMicrobiotaweight-recovered patients

Identifiers

PMID38294867
PMCPMC10832965
OpenAlexW4391384330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.