Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38294811›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2024

Live Birth After Oocyte Donation In Vitro Fertilization Cycles in Women With Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alessio Paffoni, Maíra Casalechi, Dominique De Ziegler, Ettore Cicinelli, Edgardo Somigliana, Paola Viganò, Amerigo Vitagliano

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronic Endometritis and Endometriosis: Two Sides of the Same Coin?Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessio PaffoniInfertility Unit, ASST Lariana, Cantù (Como), Italy.
Maíra CasalechiHuman Reproduction Unit of the Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Dominique De ZieglerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Human Reproduction, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Ettore CicinelliFirst Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Edgardo SomiglianaInfertility Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Paola ViganòInfertility Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy.
Amerigo VitaglianoFirst Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana · ITHôpital Foch · FRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although multiple mechanisms have been proposed to explain the infertility related to endometriosis, there are no conclusive data on the association of endometriosis with endometrial receptivity. The oocyte donation model in assisted reproduction technology (ART) cycles can clarify this issue. Objective: To explore the association of a history of endometriosis with ART outcomes in recipients of oocyte donation. Data Sources: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases were searched from inception until August 31, 2023, using combinations of relevant keywords. Moreover, we retrieved data from the databases of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in the US and the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the United Kingdom. Study Selection: Observational studies were included if they investigated the impact of endometriosis on ART outcomes with donor oocytes. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Publicly available data related to ART from various sources were gathered, and a retrospective aggregate and nonaggregate analysis using registries of in vitro fertilization cycles with oocyte or embryo donation was conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) following oocyte donor cycles. The effect measures of comparisons between groups are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% CI. Results: This study analyzed 7212 oocyte donation cycles from 4 studies for the meta-analysis, along with 162 082 cycles from 2 registries (137 182 from SART and 24 900 from HFEA). No significant differences between the groups were observed in the meta-analysis of published data after adjusting for confounding factors (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.19-1.57). A statistically significant lower LBR was identified in women with endometriosis when analyzing the aggregate data from SART and HFEA databases (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found a modest decrease in LBR among women with a history of endometriosis, although only results from the pooled analysis of registry data and not those from the meta-analysis reached statistical significance. These findings suggest that a marginal impairment of uterine receptivity may contribute to infertility mechanisms in women affected by endometriosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisInfertilityEmbryo DispositionFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthOocyte DonationPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38294811
PMCPMC10831577
OpenAlexW4391384207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.