Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38294672›Full record

Observational studyClinical drug investigation2024

Forty-Eight-Month Monitoring of Disease Activity in Patients with Long-Standing Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with TNF-α Inhibitors: Time for Clinical Outcome Prediction and Biosimilar vs Biologic Originator Performance.

Matteo Colina, Micheline Khodeir, Roberto Rimondini, Marco Valentini, Federica Campomori, Stefania Corvaglia, Gabriele Campana

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical drug investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo ColinaUOC (Operative Complex Unit) of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Service, Section of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Oncology, "Santa Maria della Scaletta" Hospital, via Montericco 4, 40026, Imola, Italy. matteo.colina2@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1174-2849
Micheline KhodeirHospital Pharmacy, Ospedale Santa Maria della Scaletta, Imola, Italy.
Roberto RimondiniAlma Mater Studiorum, Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marco ValentiniRheumatology Service, San Pier Damiano Hospital, Faenza, Italy.
Federica CampomoriUOC (Operative Complex Unit) of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Service, Section of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Oncology, "Santa Maria della Scaletta" Hospital, via Montericco 4, 40026, Imola, Italy.
Stefania CorvagliaUOC (Operative Complex Unit) of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Service, Section of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Oncology, "Santa Maria della Scaletta" Hospital, via Montericco 4, 40026, Imola, Italy.
Gabriele CampanaDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITOspedale Santa Maria · ITUniversity Hospital Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesLong-term treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors leads to initial changes in disease activity that can predict a late treatment response. This observational and retrospective study aimed to determine when it is possible to foresee the response to therapy in the case of long-standing rheumatoid arthritis comparing also the efficacy of the original biologics with their biosimilars.

methodsA total of 1598 patients were recruited and treated with the original biologics, adalimumab and etanercept, or with biosimilars. Patients were monitored over a period of 48 months and disease activity scores (28-Joint Disease Activity Score, Simplified Disease Activity Index, and Clinical Disease Activity Index) were measured every 6 months.

resultsNo differences in disease activity levels were observed in etanercept versus biosimilars (GP2015/SB4) and adalimumab versus biosimilar (GP2017) patient groups. All scores significantly decreased in all treatments during the first 18 months of therapy, and after 24 months reached a minimum that lasted up to 48 months.

conclusionsWe conclude that biosimilars of adalimumab and etanercept have equivalent effectiveness over a long period of time compared to their originator drugs, and also that the levels of disease activity after 6 months of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (originator drugs and biosimilars) might predict the response to therapy at 4 years in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsAdalimumabEtanerceptHumansInfliximabRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAdalimumabAntirheumatic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsEtanerceptInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38294672
PMCPMC10912262
OpenAlexW4391391181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.