ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024
An evaluation of the impact of China's green credit policy on different pathways using a CGE model.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of the study was to quantitatively analyze the heterogeneous effects of different green credit implementation methods on energy, environmental, and economic systems by developing a computable general equilibrium model. The specific green credit implementation methods are divided into interest-penalty policy for energy-intensive industries and interest preferential policy for green industries. Various approaches to implementing green credit can lead to distinct impacts on energy consumption, environmental outcomes, and economic performance. Green credit policy experiments are carried out utilizing short-, medium-, and long-term scenarios to investigate how the consequences of green credit policies evolve. The findings demonstrate that (1) implementing a penalty interest policy for energy-intensive industries can have substantial short-term environmental effects, cutting total demand for fossil energy and lowering carbon dioxide emissions significantly. As the cycle progresses, this effect will progressively fade and have a negative economic impact. (2) The interest preferential policy for the green industry has a significant promoting effect on green technology, and its energy and environmental effects will be reflected in the long term, and the effect will continue to increase, which has a positive promoting effect on the economy. (3) There are significant differences in the policy effects brought about by the different implementation methods of green credit policies. Both policies can positively affect social energy and the environment, but the effect cycles are different. When two types of interest policies are implemented in the economy, the negative economic effect of the penalty interest policy is greater than the positive effect of the preferential interest policy, which harms the macroeconomy. These conclusions will provide theoretical and practical references for the government and banks to choose a better green credit implementation path.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38294655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.