Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38294587›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2024

Ranked Subtree Prune and Regraft.

Lena Collienne, Chris Whidden, Alex Gavryushkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biological causes and impacts of rugged tree landscapes in phylodynamic inference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Spaces of ranked tree-child networks.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lena CollienneBiological Data Science Laboratory, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. lena@lenacoll.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-8263
Chris WhiddenFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9406-730X
Alex GavryushkinBiological Data Science Laboratory, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6299-8249

Funding

Marsden Fund 21-UOC-057Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment UOAX1932Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment UOOX1912Royal Society Te Apārangi UOC1702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees are a mathematical formalisation of evolutionary histories between organisms, species, genes, cancer cells, etc. For many applications, e.g. when analysing virus transmission trees or cancer evolution, (phylogenetic) time trees are of interest, where branch lengths represent times. Computational methods for reconstructing time trees from (typically molecular) sequence data, for example Bayesian phylogenetic inference using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, rely on algorithms that sample the treespace. They employ tree rearrangement operations such as [Formula: see text] (Subtree Prune and Regraft) and [Formula: see text] (Nearest Neighbour Interchange) or, in the case of time tree inference, versions of these that take times of internal nodes into account. While the classic [Formula: see text] tree rearrangement is well-studied, its variants for time trees are less understood, limiting comparative analysis for time tree methods. In this paper we consider a modification of the classical [Formula: see text] rearrangement on the space of ranked phylogenetic trees, which are trees equipped with a ranking of all internal nodes. This modification results in two novel treespaces, which we propose to study. We begin this study by discussing algorithmic properties of these treespaces, focusing on those relating to the complexity of computing distances under the ranked [Formula: see text] operations as well as similarities and differences to known tree rearrangement based treespaces. Surprisingly, we show the counterintuitive result that adding leaves to trees can actually decrease their ranked [Formula: see text] distance, which may have an impact on the results of time tree sampling algorithms given uncertain "rogue taxa".

Indexed as

Mathematical ConceptsModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremPhylogenyPhylogeneticsRanked treesTime treesTree distanceTree RearrangementsTreespace

Identifiers

PMID38294587
PMCPMC10830682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.